6B_1199/2016: Vio­la­ti­on of medi­cal sec­re­cy by medi­cal exami­ner → via swissblawg

The BGer has con­firm­edthat a Medi­cal exami­ner is sub­ject to medi­cal sec­re­cy within the mea­ning of Art. 321 of the Swiss Penal Code (StGB) and vio­la­tes the duty of con­fi­den­tia­li­ty if he or she not only pro­vi­des the employer with the neces­sa­ry infor­ma­ti­on of a cer­ti­fi­ca­te of fit­ness for work, but also fur­ther facts such as, in par­ti­cu­lar, the results of the exami­na­ti­on. Such dis­clo­sure would have to be cover­ed by the employee’s con­sent. In case of doubt, the Con­sent Howe­ver, the obli­ga­ti­on to pro­vi­de data must be limi­t­ed to what is neces­sa­ry alre­a­dy on the basis of Art. 328b of the Swiss Code of Obli­ga­ti­ons. In the pre­sent case, it did not cover the over­ly exten­si­ve data supply.

Details can be found in the Sum­ma­ry at swiss­blawg.

Aut­ho­ri­ty

Area

Topics

Rela­ted articles

Sub­scri­be