Take-Aways (AI)
  • The Spa­nish data pro­tec­tion super­vi­so­ry aut­ho­ri­ty AEPD impo­sed a fine of EUR 100,000 on an IT ser­vice pro­vi­der on August 17, 2021.
  • The ser­vice pro­vi­der refu­sed to pro­vi­de the con­trol­ler with the order data and access to the ser­ver despi­te the order pro­ce­s­sing agreement.
  • Data sub­jects’ rights have prio­ri­ty; pro­ces­sors should not be given the right to refu­se to per­form data processing.

The Spa­nish data pro­tec­tion super­vi­so­ry aut­ho­ri­ty AEPD has impo­sed a fine of EUR 100,000 on an IT ser­vice pro­vi­der with effect from August 17, 2021which, con­tra­ry to the pro­vi­si­on of the order pro­ce­s­sing agree­ment, it is fai­led to dis­c­lo­se the order data to the respon­si­ble per­son or to make the ser­ver ope­ra­ted by the order pro­ces­sor acce­s­si­ble. The order pro­ces­sor had objec­ted that he had out­stan­ding claims against the respon­si­ble. Appar­ent­ly, this had cau­sed high dama­ge to the per­son responsible.

The decis­i­on illu­stra­tes that the order pro­ces­sor cer­tain­ly has the pos­si­bi­li­ty to enforce claims against the con­trol­ler. Howe­ver, the rights of the data sub­jects take pre­ce­dence. For this rea­son, an order pro­ces­sor should not have a right to refu­se per­for­mance with regard to the pro­ce­s­sing of the order data, which can and, depen­ding on the case, should be sti­pu­la­ted in an order pro­ce­s­sing agreement.