Take-Aways (AI)
  • Artic­le 7(f) per­mits data pro­ce­s­sing only after balan­cing the legi­ti­ma­te inte­rests of the controller/third par­ty against the rights of the data subject.
  • The opi­ni­on pro­vi­des prac­ti­cal gui­dance on how to app­ly Artic­le 7(f) in the exi­sting legal frame­work and how to car­ry out the balan­cing exercise.
  • Recom­men­da­ti­ons are pro­po­sed to pro­mo­te future legal impro­ve­ments and cla­ri­fi­ca­ti­ons in the field of appli­ca­ti­on of Artic­le 7(f).

Opi­ni­on 06/2014 on the noti­on of legi­ti­ma­te inte­rests of the data con­trol­ler under Artic­le 7 of Direc­ti­ve 95/46/EC:

This Opi­ni­on ana­ly­zes the cri­te­ria set down in Artic­le 7 of Direc­ti­ve 95/46/EC for making data pro­ce­s­sing legi­ti­ma­te. Focu­sing on the legi­ti­ma­te inte­rests of the con­trol­ler, it pro­vi­des gui­dance on how to app­ly Artic­le 7(f) under the cur­rent legal frame­work and makes recom­men­da­ti­ons for future improvements. 

Artic­le 7(f) is the last of six grounds for the lawful pro­ce­s­sing of per­so­nal data. In effect it
requi­res a balan­cing of the legi­ti­ma­te inte­rests of the con­trol­ler, or any third par­ties to whom the data are dis­c­lo­sed, against the inte­rests or fun­da­men­tal rights of the data sub­ject. The out­co­me of this balan­cing test will deter­mi­ne whe­ther Artic­le 7(f) may be reli­ed upon as a legal ground for processing.