Take-Aways (AI)
  • Trans­fers of per­so­nal data requi­re a clear legal basis and pre­dic­ta­bi­li­ty of the con­di­ti­ons under which intel­li­gence ser­vices gain access to data.
  • Inde­pen­dent super­vi­si­on and effec­ti­ve legal reme­dies must be gua­ran­teed, as well as checks on the neces­si­ty and sui­ta­bi­li­ty of moni­to­ring measures.

On April 13, 2016, the Artic­le 29 Working Par­ty published a working paper regar­ding the justi­fi­ca­ti­on of fun­da­men­tal rights inter­fe­rence by sur­veil­lan­ce mea­su­res in the con­text of trans­fers of per­so­nal data (Working Docu­ment 01/2016 on the justi­fi­ca­ti­on of inter­fe­ren­ces with the fun­da­men­tal rights to pri­va­cy and data pro­tec­tion through sur­veil­lan­ce mea­su­res when trans­fer­ring per­so­nal data (Euro­pean Essen­ti­al Gua­ran­tees)).

Accor­ding to the working group, four essen­ti­al gua­ran­tees (Euro­pean Essen­ti­al Gua­ran­tees) would have to be obser­ved in the trans­fer of per­so­nal data in order to pro­tect the fun­da­men­tal rights of data sub­jects against sur­veil­lan­ce mea­su­res by intel­li­gence services:

  1. Data pro­ce­s­sing should be based on clear, spe­ci­fic and acce­s­si­ble rules. Accor­din­gly, inter­ven­ti­ons in fun­da­men­tal rights requi­re a legal basis. Data sub­jects should be able to pre­dict the con­di­ti­ons under which intel­li­gence ser­vices can gain access to their per­so­nal data, the cir­cum­stances that may give rise to sur­veil­lan­ce mea­su­res and the type of sur­veil­lan­ce mea­su­res that may be car­ri­ed out.
  2. The actions of the intel­li­gence ser­vices and the imple­men­ta­ti­on of sur­veil­lan­ce mea­su­res must be neces­sa­ry and appro­pria­te. It is the­r­e­fo­re neces­sa­ry to weigh the inte­rests of the intel­li­gence ser­vices in data access and data coll­ec­tion against the inte­rest of the data sub­ject in the pro­tec­tion of his or her per­so­nal data and pri­va­te and fami­ly life.
  3. An inde­pen­dent super­vi­so­ry mecha­nism is nee­ded. Super­vi­si­on would not neces­s­a­ri­ly have to be sub­or­di­na­ted to a court, but could also be taken over by an inde­pen­dent admi­ni­stra­ti­ve aut­ho­ri­ty or a par­lia­men­ta­ry body. Howe­ver, the super­vi­so­ry body must be equal­ly inde­pen­dent and com­pe­tent in order to be able to actual­ly exer­cise the neces­sa­ry supervision.
  4. Effec­ti­ve legal reme­dies need to be estab­lished. Every data sub­ject must have an effec­ti­ve legal reme­dy against the access and pro­ce­s­sing of his or her per­so­nal data in con­nec­tion with sur­veil­lan­ce mea­su­res by intel­li­gence services.

The Working Par­ty empha­si­zes that the essen­ti­al safe­guards must also be obser­ved in the trans­fer of per­so­nal data to third count­ries, sin­ce a trans­fer may only take place to third count­ries that gua­ran­tee an ade­qua­te level of data pro­tec­tion from a Euro­pean perspective.