Refi­ne selection:

Can­ton SO: Non-adop­ti­on of cri­mi­nal pro­ce­e­dings due to vio­la­ti­on of the duty to pro­vi­de information
Can­ton of ZH: Advo­gen penal­ty order for deli­bera­te­ly pro­vi­ding incom­ple­te information
ECJ (Case C‑203/22): Meaningful infor­ma­ti­on on the logic of AEE and profiling
LAG Ham­burg: Con­trac­tu­al for­feit­u­re of data sub­ject rights may be permissible
Zurich muni­ci­pal magistrate’s office: penal­ty order for fal­se information
SNB
FAC (A‑4873/2021): In prin­ci­ple, the right to infor­ma­ti­on does not extend to docu­ments – excep­ti­on for “con­tex­tua­lizati­on”?
noyb: Com­plaint against Ope­nAI (infor­ma­ti­on and correction)
VG Ber­lin: Unre­a­sonable infor­ma­ti­on about video recor­dings; per­so­nal refe­rence of the recor­dings (left open)
ECJ
ECJ C‑634/21: Cre­dit score (of SCHUFA) as an auto­ma­ted decision
8C_723/2022: Inap­pro­pria­te request for infor­ma­ti­on in IV pro­ce­e­dings (con­fir­ma­ti­on of case law)
ECJ
ECJ, C‑307/22: no justi­fi­ca­ti­on of the right to infor­ma­ti­on; sub­ject mat­ter of the infor­ma­ti­on and natio­nal cost regulation
OGer TG (30.6.22): Right to infor­ma­ti­on – exclu­si­on in the case of pen­ding pro­ce­e­dings; requi­re­ments for sub­stan­tia­ti­on of the request for information
1 2 3 4 5 6 7