Behör­de: EuGH 
ECJ (Case C‑413/23): no dis­clo­sure of “per­so­nal data” if the pseud­ony­mizati­on can­not be remo­ved for the recipient
ECJ (C‑710/23): GDPR appli­ca­ble to data of repre­sen­ta­ti­ves in con­tracts; rela­ti­on­ship to the right of publicity
ECJ (Case C‑203/22): Meaningful infor­ma­ti­on on the logic of AEE and profiling
ECJ (Case C‑416/23): Duty of super­vi­so­ry aut­ho­ri­ties to deal with complaints
ECJ (Case C‑507/23): Apo­lo­gy and pos­si­bly com­pen­sa­ti­on for non-mate­ri­al damage
ECJ (Case C‑621/22): Cla­ri­fi­ca­ti­ons on the legi­ti­ma­te eco­no­mic interest
ECJ (Case C‑768/21): No sub­jec­ti­ve right to reme­dies vis-à-vis super­vi­so­ry authorities
ECJ, C‑21/23 in the case of Lin­den­apo­the­ke: Data from the online orde­ring of phar­ma­cy-only medi­ci­nes are health data
ECJ, C/422/5 – Schrems c. Meta: Dis­pro­por­tio­na­te pro­ce­s­sing by Meta; data obvious­ly made public
1 2 3 4 5 6