Refi­ne selection:

ECJ (Case C‑203/22): Meaningful infor­ma­ti­on on the logic of AEE and profiling
ECJ
ECJ (Case C‑416/23): Duty of super­vi­so­ry aut­ho­ri­ties to deal with complaints
ECJ
ECJ (Case C‑507/23): Apo­lo­gy and pos­si­bly com­pen­sa­ti­on for non-mate­ri­al damage
ECJ
ECJ (Case C‑621/22): Cla­ri­fi­ca­ti­ons on the legi­ti­ma­te eco­no­mic interest
ECJ
ECJ (Case C‑768/21): No sub­jec­ti­ve right to reme­dies vis-à-vis super­vi­so­ry authorities
ECJ
ECJ, C‑21/23 in the case of Lin­den­apo­the­ke: Data from the online orde­ring of phar­ma­cy-only medi­ci­nes are health data
ECJ
ECJ, C/422/5 – Schrems c. Meta: Dis­pro­por­tio­na­te pro­ce­s­sing by Meta; data obvious­ly made public
ECJ
ECJ in the case of IAB Euro­pe: broad inter­pre­ta­ti­on of the con­cept of per­so­nal data: con­nec­tion based on the pur­po­se is suf­fi­ci­ent; joint respon­si­bi­li­ty of IAB with the members
ECJ
ECJ i.S. (C‑667/21): Rela­ti­on­ship bet­ween Art. 9 and Art. 6 GDPR
1 2 3 4 5