e‑Privacy Regu­la­ti­on: new proposal

The long-dis­cus­sed and repea­ted­ly amen­ded pro­po­sal of the e‑Privacy Regu­la­ti­on had been drop­ped in Decem­ber 2019 (cf. here). The Pre­si­den­cy of the Euro­pean Coun­cil has now, at the end of Febru­ary 2020, new Adap­t­ati­on pro­po­sals The draft con­ta­ins a num­ber of amend­ments, inclu­ding to Artic­le 8 of the draft, which is par­ti­cu­lar­ly con­tro­ver­si­al. This con­cerns the “pro­tec­tion of infor­ma­ti­on stored in or rela­ting to end-user ter­mi­nal equip­ment,” i.e., the Coo­kies and other tech­no­lo­gies such as fin­ger­prin­ting.

The new pro­po­sal moves away from the strict con­sent requi­re­ment for pro­ce­s­sing that is not ope­ra­tio­nal­ly neces­sa­ry. Accor­ding to the pro­po­sed new Art. 8, the use of coo­kies and other tech­no­lo­gies should be per­mit­ted under cer­tain con­di­ti­ons. also for legi­ti­ma­te inte­rests (cf. Art. 6 para. 1 lit. f DSGVO) may be permitted:

it is neces­sa­ry for the pur­po­se of the legi­ti­ma­te inte­rests pur­sued by a ser­vice pro­vi­der to use pro­ce­s­sing and sto­rage capa­bi­li­ties of ter­mi­nal equip­ment or to coll­ect infor­ma­ti­on from an end-user’s ter­mi­nal equip­ment, except when such inte­rest is over­ridden by the inte­rests or fun­da­men­tal rights and free­doms of the end-user.

Howe­ver, the invo­ca­ti­on of the legi­ti­ma­te inte­rest shall be exclu­ded in cer­tain cases:

The end-user’s inte­rests shall be dee­med to over­ri­de the inte­rests of the ser­vice pro­vi­der whe­re the end-user is a child or whe­re the ser­vice pro­vi­der pro­ce­s­ses, stores or coll­ects the infor­ma­ti­on to deter­mi­ne the natu­re and cha­rac­te­ri­stics of the end-user or to build an indi­vi­du­al pro­fi­le of the end-user or the pro­ce­s­sing, sto­rage or coll­ec­tion of the infor­ma­ti­on by the ser­vice pro­vi­der con­ta­ins spe­cial cate­go­ries of per­so­nal data as refer­red to in Artic­le 9(1) of Regu­la­ti­on (EU) 2016/679.

In addi­ti­on, anyo­ne wis­hing to invo­ke legi­ti­ma­te inte­rest must not dis­c­lo­se the data in que­sti­on to third par­ties, must car­ry out a data pro­tec­tion impact assess­ment, must inform the data sub­jects and must take secu­ri­ty mea­su­res such as pseud­ony­mizati­on or encryption.

Aut­ho­ri­ty

Area

Topics

Rela­ted articles

Sub­scri­be