Take-Aways (AI)
  • The FDPIC is respon­si­ble for data pro­tec­tion issues rela­ting to Goog­le Street View and asses­ses com­pli­ance with the pro­tec­tion of privacy.
  • Auto­ma­tic anony­mizati­on must cor­re­spond to the sta­te of the art; up to approx. 1% of insuf­fi­ci­ent­ly anony­mi­zed images tole­ra­ted, post-pro­ce­s­sing on display.
  • Com­ple­te anony­mizati­on befo­re con­nec­tion for sen­si­ti­ve faci­li­ties; spe­cial pro­tec­tion obli­ga­ti­ons for schools, hos­pi­tals, reti­re­ment homes, courts, etc.
  • Images of pro­tec­ted pri­va­te are­as (over 2 m) may not be published wit­hout con­sent; tran­si­tio­nal peri­od of up to three years.

BGE 138 II 346 i.S. Goog­le Street View (in addi­ti­on also swiss­blawg):

Rega­lia
Data Pro­tec­tion Act, Art. 28 et seq. ZGB; gua­ran­tee of the pro­tec­tion of per­so­na­li­ty in the publi­ca­ti­on of per­so­nal data in Goog­le Street View.
Com­pe­tence of the FDPIC (E. 3). Con­cept of per­so­nal data in rela­ti­on to the images used in Goog­le Street View (E. 6.5). Data pro­tec­tion regu­la­ti­ons for the pro­ce­s­sing of per­so­nal data (E. 7). Con­cre­tizati­on of the pro­tec­tion of per­so­na­li­ty gua­ran­teed in Art. 28 CC by data pro­tec­tion law, right to infor­ma­tio­nal self-deter­mi­na­ti­on and right to one’s own image (E. 8). Con­side­ra­ti­on of gene­ral prin­ci­ples of data pro­tec­tion law (E. 9).
Weig­hing of inte­rests with regard to the que­sti­on of whe­ther and to what ext­ent the pro­ce­s­sing methods as a who­le are sui­ta­ble to inf­rin­ge the per­so­na­li­ty of a lar­ge num­ber of per­sons: It is accept­ed that at most approx. 1 % of the images reach the Inter­net in an insuf­fi­ci­ent­ly anony­mi­zed form and that reco­gnizable per­sons and vehic­le licen­se pla­tes are only sub­se­quent­ly made unre­co­gnizable manu­al­ly upon noti­fi­ca­ti­on of the per­sons con­cer­ned (E. 10.6 and 10.7). Obli­ga­ti­on for effi­ci­ent, unbu­reau­cra­tic and free sub­se­quent anony­mizati­on (E. 10.6.3 and 14.4). The pri­or auto­ma­tic anony­mizati­on must be con­ti­nuous­ly adapt­ed to the sta­te of the art (E. 10.6.5 and 14.1). In the case of sen­si­ti­ve faci­li­ties (schools, hos­pi­tals, old people’s homes, women’s shel­ters, courts and pri­sons, etc.), com­ple­te anony­mizati­on of per­sons and iden­ti­fiers must be car­ri­ed out befo­re posting on the Inter­net (E. 10.6.4 and 14.2). Images of pri­va­te are­as such as enc­lo­sed cour­ty­ards, gar­dens, etc., which remain clo­sed to the view of ordi­na­ry passers-by, may not in prin­ci­ple be published wit­hout the con­sent of the per­sons con­cer­ned, inso­far as they were taken from a came­ra height of more than 2 m; tran­si­tio­nal peri­od of max. three years for the rem­oval of images alre­a­dy posted which do not com­ply with this requi­re­ment (E. 10.7 and 14.3). Obli­ga­ti­on to inform the media in gene­ral about the pos­si­bi­li­ty of objec­tion and spe­ci­fi­cal­ly about upco­ming recor­dings and uploa­ding of images (E. 10.6.3, 11 and 14.4).