Bran­che: Immobilien 
CJ GE: Inad­mis­si­bi­li­ty of video recor­dings in cri­mi­nal pro­ce­e­dings for exce­e­ding the inten­ded purpose
BVwG AT: Pro­per­ty mana­ger as respon­si­ble par­ty; cla­ri­fi­ca­ti­on of the term
BGer (4A_105/2024): Justi­fi­ca­ti­on of the con­tract (pro­cu­re­ment of infor­ma­ti­on in the tenancy)
EDPB: def. ver­si­on of the gui­de­lines on video surveillance.
ECJ on the admis­si­bi­li­ty of video sur­veil­lan­ce in ren­tal pro­per­ties (Case C‑708/18)
Yes, door­bell signs are com­pa­ti­ble with the GDPR.
Moti­on Alle­mann (17.3328): Adapt inspec­tion of ancil­la­ry cost rece­ipts to today’s conditions
swiss­blawg on the judgment 4A_576/2015 con­cer­ning the limits of video sur­veil­lan­ce in ren­tal pro­per­ties under data pro­tec­tion law
FDPIC – Land­lord eva­lua­ti­on plat­form on the Internet
1 2