Take-Aways (AI)
  • The Fede­ral Coun­cil curr­ent­ly sees no need for addi­tio­nal regu­la­to­ry mea­su­res in the area of social media, as many issues have alre­a­dy been taken into account in cur­rent projects.
  • Chal­lenges exist in cross-bor­der law enforce­ment and the lack of spe­ci­fic trans­pa­ren­cy regu­la­ti­ons for adver­ti­sing in social media.

On May 10, 2017, the Fede­ral Coun­cil deter­mi­ned that curr­ent­ly. the­re is no need for new regu­la­to­ry mea­su­res in the area of social media (Media release).

In Octo­ber 2013, the Fede­ral Coun­cil pre­sen­ted an initi­al report entit­led “Legal Basis for Social Media”, but at that time it con­side­red the legal situa­ti­on – in par­ti­cu­lar the ongo­ing revi­si­on of the DPA . to be too unclear to assess the need for regu­la­ti­on of social media. The Fede­ral Coun­cil has the­r­e­fo­re asses­sed deve­lo­p­ments sin­ce then in a new report.

In it, he sum­ma­ri­zes his fin­dings as follows:

As this updated sta­tus report shows, the issues rai­sed in the 2013 Social Media Report are issues have been taken into account as far as pos­si­ble in the cur­rent regu­la­to­ry pro­jects. The Fede­ral Coun­cil the­r­e­fo­re con­clu­des that no addi­tio­nal regu­la­to­ry acti­vi­ties need to be trig­ge­red with regard to social media at present.
The right to data por­ta­bi­li­ty is the sub­ject of a com­pre­hen­si­ve ana­ly­sis of the legal situa­ti­on in Switz­er­land, the EU and sel­ec­ted com­pa­ra­tor count­ries. It is plan­ned that it will be pre­sen­ted by the end of 2017 as part of the imple­men­ta­ti­on of the Fede­ral Council’s “Digi­tal Switz­er­land” stra­tegy. The Fede­ral Depart­ment of Justi­ce and Poli­ce (FDJP) is in char­ge of this work.

Spe­ci­fic decla­ra­ti­on requi­re­ments for adver­ti­sing in social media are curr­ent­ly lack­ing in cur­rent Swiss law. Only the gene­ral pro­vi­si­ons of fair tra­ding law must be obser­ved. With the incre­a­sing popu­la­ri­ty and pro­fes­sio­na­lizati­on of social media stars, howe­ver, social plat­forms are beco­ming more and more popu­lar as dis­tri­bu­ti­on chan­nels for com­mer­cial adver­ti­sing mes­sa­ges as well. The unbi­a­sed for­ma­ti­on of opi­ni­ons among reci­pi­en­ts sug­gests this, to extend the trans­pa­ren­cy requi­re­ment appli­ca­ble to radio and TV adver­ti­sing to social media. The­se and other regu­la­to­ry issues are the sub­ject of the cur­rent review of whe­ther Swiss law should be har­mo­ni­zed with cor­re­spon­ding Euro­pean regu­la­ti­ons and regu­la­to­ry pro­jects in cer­tain areas.

Law enforce­ment in the cross-bor­der area in con­nec­tion with social media remains pro­ble­ma­tic. As evi­den­ced by various par­lia­men­ta­ry initia­ti­ves, the topic is also attrac­ting poli­ti­cal atten­ti­on. In March 2017, the Coun­cil of Sta­tes pas­sed the Moti­on Lev­rat 16.4082 “Making it easier for law enforce­ment aut­ho­ri­ties to access data from social net­works” to the rele­vant com­mis­si­on for preli­mi­na­ry exami­na­ti­on. The Fede­ral Supre­me Court has also addres­sed the issue. The ongo­ing efforts at inter­na­tio­nal level, e.g. in the Coun­cil of Euro­pe, to find a prac­ti­cal solu­ti­on here should be vigo­rous­ly pur­sued by Switzerland.