DPA revi­si­on – next stage: con­sul­ta­ti­on in the Coun­cil of States

Fol­lo­wing the con­clu­si­on of detail­ed dis­cus­sions on the revi­si­on of the Data Pro­tec­tion Act in the Natio­nal Coun­cil, the mat­ter will now be dis­cus­sed by the Sta­te Poli­cy Com­mit­tee of the Coun­cil of Sta­tes (SPK‑S). As time is pres­sing, the detail­ed dis­cus­sions in the Coun­cil of Sta­tes are alre­a­dy sche­du­led for Decem­ber, and an infor­mal con­sul­ta­ti­on is alre­a­dy under­way. As things stand at pre­sent, the­re are two points in par­ti­cu­lar that will have to be tack­led: First­ly, fol­lo­wing the vote in the Natio­nal Coun­cil, the cur­rent draft law still has loopho­les which, in the worst case, could jeo­par­di­ze the Commission’s inten­ded decis­i­on on ade­qua­cy. For exam­p­le, the­re is a limi­t­ed obli­ga­ti­on to inform tho­se respon­si­ble in the event of dis­pro­por­tio­na­te effort, and con­tra­ry to the Fede­ral Council’s draft, the majo­ri­ty in the Natio­nal Coun­cil deci­ded against sanc­tions for inten­tio­nal non-com­pli­ance with the mini­mum data secu­ri­ty requi­re­ments. On the other hand, the­re are still dif­fe­ren­ces bet­ween the poli­ti­cal camps regar­ding the hand­ling of profiling. 

If the tight time­ta­ble of the SPK‑S is adhered to, the reso­lu­ti­on of dif­fe­ren­ces and the final vote will have to be car­ri­ed out in the coming spring, befo­re the Com­mis­si­on final­ly deci­des on the ade­qua­cy of the FADP with Euro­pean legis­la­ti­on pro­ba­b­ly in the fol­lo­wing May. It the­r­e­fo­re remains to be seen exact­ly when the mat­ter will be deba­ted by the Coun­cil of Sta­tes and the sub­se­quent reso­lu­ti­on of dif­fe­ren­ces bet­ween the Coun­cils next spring.

Aut­ho­ri­ty

Area

Topics

Rela­ted articles

Sub­scri­be