The Fede­ral Coun­cil has deci­ded to rest­rict the log­ging obli­ga­ti­on for fede­ral bodies in accordance with Art. 4 DPO to Decem­ber 1, 2025:

This obli­ga­ti­on curr­ent­ly applies to all auto­ma­ted pro­ce­s­sing (para. 2). Howe­ver, accor­ding to the Fede­ral Council’s press release, it has been shown in prac­ti­ce that the risks of pro­ce­s­sing do not out­weigh the costs of log­ging. The Fede­ral Coun­cil has the­r­e­fo­re deci­ded to fol­low the risk-based approach of data pro­tec­tion law for the log­ging obli­ga­ti­on for fede­ral bodies as well. Fol­lo­wing the amend­ment to the DPA, the fol­lo­wing regu­la­ti­on should app­ly (limi­t­ed to auto­ma­ted pro­ce­s­sing in each case). :

  • per­so­nal data requi­ring spe­cial pro­tec­tionPro­fil­ing; Pro­ce­s­sing within the scope of the Schen­gen Direc­ti­veLog­ging
  • Other per­so­nal dataPer­form a risk assess­ment, in wri­ting (and pre­fer­a­b­ly as part of the secu­ri­ty pro­ce­du­re in accordance with Art. 16 ff. ISG). Upon request, the FDPIC must be infor­med of the “result and con­tent” of the audit. The result of the audit then deter­mi­nes both the sub­ject mat­ter and the scope of the logging

The­r­e­fo­re, the Tran­si­tio­nal pro­vi­si­on on log­ging in Art. 46 DPA:

  • For all auto­ma­ted pro­ce­s­sing of nor­mal per­so­nal data that was plan­ned or star­ted befo­re Decem­ber 1, 2025, the risk assess­ment must be com­ple­ted by End of 2026 to be car­ri­ed out.
  • If log­ging is requi­red, this must be com­ple­ted by Decem­ber 31, 2029 be implemented.
  • At No tran­si­tio­nal pro­vi­si­on applies to pro­ce­s­sing with spe­cial risks.

In addi­ti­on, the Fede­ral Coun­cil cla­ri­fi­es through two fur­ther amend­ments that the “Read” when log­ging the “Acce­s­sing the data” means. Other amend­ments con­cern cos­me­tics and the ordi­nan­ce on mili­ta­ry and other infor­ma­ti­on systems in the DDPS.

A Del­ta­view of the chan­ges in the DSV is available here.