FDPIC – Intro­duc­tion of bio­me­tric data in iden­ti­ty cards

In con­trast, we have con­sidera­ble reser­va­tions about the use of bio­me­tric data for iden­ti­fi­ca­ti­on pur­po­ses (1:n com­pa­ri­son), which is ine­vi­ta­b­ly asso­cia­ted with cen­tral sto­rage of the data. Such pro­ce­s­sing of sen­si­ti­ve data is per­mis­si­ble if the pur­po­se limi­ta­ti­on and access rights to this data are regu­la­ted in suf­fi­ci­ent detail in a legal basis in the for­mal sen­se (ID card law). Inde­ed, only a rigid legal frame­work can limit the risks of misu­se and exce­s­ses as well as the dan­ger of using the bio­me­tric data as access keys to various data­ba­ses and thus lin­king dif­fe­rent data sets. In our opi­ni­on, the amend­ment to the ID card law pro­po­sed in the abo­ve-men­tio­ned fede­ral reso­lu­ti­on does not meet the con­di­ti­ons men­tio­ned here. For this rea­son, we did not sup­port the reten­ti­on of bio­me­tric data in the ISA and ISR files for iden­ti­fi­ca­ti­on purposes.

Source: FDPIC – Intro­duc­tion of bio­me­tric data in iden­ti­ty cards

Aut­ho­ri­ty

Area

Topics

Rela­ted articles

Sub­scri­be