Addres­ses and other per­so­nal data of poten­ti­al cus­to­mers are cru­cial for effi­ci­ent direct mar­ke­ting. With the help of the most accu­ra­te infor­ma­ti­on pos­si­ble on age, occu­pa­ti­on, con­su­mer beha­vi­or, etc., the risk of unsuc­cessful adver­ti­sing can be mini­mi­zed. The­re is a gre­at wil­ling­ness among the popu­la­ti­on to pro­vi­de infor­ma­ti­on. Even inti­ma­te data are dis­c­lo­sed if the respond­ents think they would make their data available for a sci­en­ti­fic pro­ject. It seems to be par­ti­cu­lar­ly pro­duc­ti­ve to con­duct such sur­veys in con­nec­tion with par­ti­ci­pa­ti­on in a con­test or sweepsta­kes, whe­re the pur­po­se of the data coll­ec­tion is not cle­ar­ly evi­dent. Thus, poten­ti­al cus­to­mers are indu­ced to vol­un­t­a­ri­ly hand over their data. Such covert com­mer­cial data coll­ec­tion (which has not­hing to do with sci­en­ti­fic insti­tu­tes of opi­ni­on rese­arch) and the­r­e­fo­re adver­ti­sing mea­su­res that are not reco­gnizable as such are inadmissible.

Source: FDPIC – Coll­ec­tion of per­so­nal data for mar­ke­ting purposes