Take-Aways (AI)
  • The FDPIC cri­ti­ci­zes the fact that the FTA does not inform “only indi­rect­ly affec­ted” third par­ties in advan­ce and thus vio­la­tes Art. 14 para. 2 StA­hiG (trans­pa­ren­cy).
  • FDPIC con­clu­ded inve­sti­ga­ti­on, FTA rejec­ted recom­men­da­ti­on; case is with the FDF pur­su­ant to Art. 27 para. 5 FADP, decis­i­ons of other instances pending.

The FDPIC has published an “Update in the US tax dis­pu­te” – the update con­sists of the fact that the­re is not­hing new. It con­cerns the FDPIC’s cla­ri­fi­ca­ti­on of the facts in con­nec­tion with requests for admi­ni­stra­ti­ve assi­stance from the Inter­nal Reve­nue Ser­vice (IRS) to the Fede­ral Tax Admi­ni­stra­ti­on (FTA). The FDPIC has com­ple­ted its cla­ri­fi­ca­ti­on of the facts with Recom­men­da­ti­on from 18 Decem­ber 2017 com­ple­ted. It was about

  • first­ly, the que­sti­on of when per­so­nal data may only be released in redac­ted form and when in unre­dac­ted form. This depends on whe­ther the per­son con­cer­ned is “affec­ted” by the admi­ni­stra­ti­ve assi­stance. If it is, it does not fall under Art. 4(3) of the Tax Admi­ni­stra­ti­ve Assi­stance Act (StA­hiG), which rest­ricts the pro­vi­si­on of data. The FDPIC has not accu­sed the FTA of anything under this heading;
  • and about the fur­ther que­sti­on, when to inform in advan­ce third par­ties who­se infor­ma­ti­on is to be trans­mit­ted wit­hout redac­tion are. The FTA does not inform “only indi­rect­ly affec­ted per­sons” here. The Accor­ding to the FDPIC, vio­la­tes the trans­pa­ren­cy rule from Art. 14 para. 2 StA­hiG.

The FTA has rejec­ted the FDPIC’s recom­men­da­ti­on, which is why the FDPIC has refer­red the mat­ter to the FDF for a decis­i­on pur­su­ant to Art. 27 (5) FADP. Howe­ver, the FDF has not yet issued a ruling, which is why the FDPIC cal­led for haste. Only when the FDF has issued a ruling can the mat­ter be sub­mit­ted to the Fede­ral Admi­ni­stra­ti­ve Court (Art. 27 para. 6 FADP).

Prof. Andrea Opel wro­te in the NZZ this week (8÷14). a con­tri­bu­ti­on to the topic pro­ba­b­ly as a fol­low-up to the St. Gal­len semi­nar on the inter­na­tio­nal exch­an­ge of infor­ma­ti­on in tax mat­ters in June 2018, about which the Tages-Anzei­ger has repor­ted.