Gesetz: DSGVO 82 
ECJ (Case C‑507/23): Apo­lo­gy and pos­si­bly com­pen­sa­ti­on for non-mate­ri­al damage
ECJ C‑340/21: Ade­qua­te data secu­ri­ty (con­cept and bur­den of pro­of); lia­bi­li­ty for breaches
ECJ, Case C‑300/21 i.S. Öster­rei­chi­sche Post: GA moti­ons: dama­ges under GDPR 82 pre­sup­po­se harm.
BVerfG: Obli­ga­ti­on to refer the que­sti­on of whe­ther a mate­ria­li­ty thres­hold applies to claims for dama­ges under the GDPR
LG Ham­burg on the cla­im for com­pen­sa­ti­on for imma­te­ri­al damage
ArbG Düs­sel­dorf: Com­pen­sa­ti­on of EUR 5,000 for late and incom­ple­te infor­ma­ti­on pro­vi­ded to an employee; signi­fi­can­ce of tur­no­ver for the sub­sti­tu­te assessment
Coun­cil of Sta­te NL: Breach of the GDPR does not yet imply dama­ge; no puni­ti­ve cha­rac­ter of the cla­im for damages
OGH (AT): Bur­den of pro­of for facts giving rise to a cla­im under the GDPR 82
DSK: Con­cept “for the assess­ment of fines in pro­ce­e­dings against companies”
1 2