fold out | fold

I. Gene­ral provisions

§ 1 Object and purpose
1 This law regu­la­tes the hand­ling of infor­ma­ti­on by public bodies.
2 It aims to,
a. to make the actions of public bodies trans­pa­rent and thus pro­mo­te the free for­ma­ti­on of opi­ni­on and the exer­cise of demo­cra­tic rights as well as faci­li­ta­te the con­trol of govern­ment action,
b. to pro­tect the fun­da­men­tal rights of per­sons about whom the public bodies pro­cess data.
§ 2 Scope of application
This law applies to public bodies. 
§ 2a Excep­ti­ons: a. Can­to­nal Council
1 This Act does not app­ly to the rela­ti­on­ship bet­ween the Can­to­nal Coun­cil and its stan­ding com­mit­tees and the aut­ho­ri­ties and insti­tu­ti­ons that are sub­ject to its ulti­ma­te supervision.
2 Inso­far as the Can­to­nal Coun­cil is sub­ject to this Act, the data pro­tec­tion offi­cer shall not have the powers set out in § 10 para­graph 2, § 12a para­graphs 1 and 2, § 34 let­ters c, d and f and §§ 35 – 36a.
§ 2b Excep­ti­ons: b. Courts and law enforce­ment authorities
1 In court pro­ce­e­dings and pro­ce­e­dings by cri­mi­nal pro­se­cu­ti­on aut­ho­ri­ties pur­su­ant to sec­tion 86 para­graph 1 let­ters b and c of the Act on the Orga­nizati­on of Courts and Aut­ho­ri­ties in Civil and Cri­mi­nal Pro­ce­e­dings of 10 May 2010, the rights of the per­sons con­cer­ned and the rights of third par­ties to inspect the docu­ments are gover­ned by the spe­cial sta­tu­to­ry provisions.
2 This Act applies to the pro­ce­s­sing of per­so­nal data unless spe­cial laws con­tain pro­vi­si­ons to the contrary.
3 Inso­far as the courts are sub­ject to this Act, the data pro­tec­tion offi­cer shall not have the powers set out in § 10 para­graph 2, § 12a para­graphs 1 and 2, § 34 let­ters c, d and f and §§ 35 – 36a.
§ 2c Excep­ti­ons: c. Par­ti­ci­pa­ti­on in eco­no­mic competition
1 This Act shall not app­ly inso­far as public bodies par­ti­ci­pa­te in eco­no­mic com­pe­ti­ti­on and do not act in a sove­reign capacity.
2 The Fede­ral Act on Data Pro­tec­tion shall app­ly muta­tis mut­an­dis to the pro­ce­s­sing of per­so­nal data. Super­vi­si­on is exer­cis­ed by the data pro­tec­tion offi­cer in accordance with §§ 30 ff.
§ 3 Terms
1 Public bodies are:
a. the Can­to­nal Coun­cil, the muni­ci­pal par­lia­ments and the muni­ci­pal assemblies,
b. Aut­ho­ri­ties and admi­ni­stra­ti­ve units of the can­ton and the municipalities,
c. Orga­nizati­ons and per­sons under public and pri­va­te law, inso­far as they are ent­ru­sted with the per­for­mance of public tasks.
2 Infor­ma­ti­on is all records rela­ting to the ful­fill­ment of a public task, regard­less of their form of pre­sen­ta­ti­on and their infor­ma­ti­on car­ri­er. Records that have not been com­ple­ted or that are inten­ded exclu­si­ve­ly for per­so­nal use are excluded.
3 Per­so­nal data is infor­ma­ti­on that rela­tes to an iden­ti­fi­ed or iden­ti­fia­ble person.
4 Spe­cial per­so­nal data are:
a. Infor­ma­ti­on which, due to its importance, the natu­re of its pro­ce­s­sing or the pos­si­bi­li­ty of its com­bi­na­ti­on with other infor­ma­ti­on, poses a par­ti­cu­lar risk of per­so­nal inju­ry, such as infor­ma­ti­on about
_1._ reli­gious, ideo­lo­gi­cal, poli­ti­cal or trade uni­on views or activities,
_2._ health, pri­va­cy, eth­nic ori­gin and gene­tic and bio­me­tric data,
_3._ Social assi­stance measures,
_4._ admi­ni­stra­ti­ve or cri­mi­nal pro­se­cu­ti­ons or sanctions.
b. Com­pi­la­ti­ons of infor­ma­ti­on that allow an assess­ment of essen­ti­al aspects of the per­so­na­li­ty of natu­ral persons.
c. auto­ma­ted eva­lua­tions of infor­ma­ti­on in order to ana­ly­ze key per­so­nal cha­rac­te­ri­stics or pre­dict per­so­nal deve­lo­p­ments (pro­fil­ing).
5 Pro­ce­s­sing is any hand­ling of infor­ma­ti­on such as obtai­ning, sto­ring, using, rewor­king, dis­clo­sing or destroying.
6 Dis­clo­sure is the making available of infor­ma­ti­on such as gran­ting access, pas­sing on or publishing.

II. prin­ci­ples in hand­ling information

1. in general

§ 4 Trans­pa­ren­cy principle
The public body shall orga­ni­ze the hand­ling of infor­ma­ti­on in such a way that it can pro­vi­de infor­ma­ti­on quick­ly, com­pre­hen­si­ve­ly and factually. 
§ 5 Infor­ma­ti­on management
1 The public body mana­ges its infor­ma­ti­on in such a way that admi­ni­stra­ti­ve action is com­pre­hen­si­ble and accoun­ta­bi­li­ty is gua­ran­teed. If seve­ral public bodies pro­cess a joint stock of infor­ma­ti­on, they regu­la­te the responsibilities.
2 If the public body no lon­ger needs infor­ma­ti­on and fin­ding aids for its admi­ni­stra­ti­ve acti­vi­ties, it shall retain them for a maxi­mum of ten years.
3 At the end of the reten­ti­on peri­od, the public body shall offer the infor­ma­ti­on and fin­ding aids to the rele­vant archi­ve. Infor­ma­ti­on that is not archi­ved must be destroyed.
4 For the can­to­nal admi­ni­stra­ti­on, the can­to­nal govern­ment regu­la­tes the details in an ordinance.
§ 6 Pro­ce­s­sing on behalf of
1 The public body may dele­ga­te the pro­ce­s­sing of infor­ma­ti­on to third par­ties, pro­vi­ded the­re is no legal pro­vi­si­on or con­trac­tu­al agree­ment to the contrary.
2 It remains respon­si­ble for the hand­ling of infor­ma­ti­on in accordance with this Act.
§ 7 Infor­ma­ti­on security
1 The public body shall pro­tect infor­ma­ti­on through appro­pria­te orga­nizatio­nal and tech­ni­cal measures.
2 The mea­su­res are based on the fol­lo­wing pro­tec­tion goals:
a. Infor­ma­ti­on must not be dis­c­lo­sed unlawfully,
b. Infor­ma­ti­on must be cor­rect and complete,
c. Infor­ma­ti­on must be available when required,
d. Infor­ma­ti­on pro­ce­s­sing must be attri­bu­ta­ble to a person,
e. Chan­ges to infor­ma­ti­on must be reco­gnizable and traceable.
3 The mea­su­res to be taken depend on the type of infor­ma­ti­on, the type and pur­po­se of use and the cur­rent sta­te of the art.

2. spe­cial prin­ci­ples in hand­ling per­so­nal data

§ 8 Legality
1 The public body may pro­cess per­so­nal data inso­far as this is appro­pria­te and neces­sa­ry for the ful­fill­ment of its legal­ly defi­ned tasks.
2 The pro­ce­s­sing of spe­cial per­so­nal data requi­res a suf­fi­ci­ent­ly spe­ci­fic regu­la­ti­on in a for­mal law.
§ 9 Earmarking
1 The public body may only pro­cess per­so­nal data for the pur­po­se for which it was coll­ec­ted, unless a legal pro­vi­si­on express­ly pro­vi­des for fur­ther use or the data sub­ject cons­ents in indi­vi­du­al cases.
2 The public body may pro­cess per­so­nal data for a non-per­so­nal pur­po­se if they are anony­mi­zed and no con­clu­si­ons can be drawn about the data sub­jects from the evaluations.
§ 10 Data pro­tec­tion impact assess­ment and pri­or checking
1 The public body asses­ses the risks to the fun­da­men­tal rights of the data sub­jects when pro­ce­s­sing per­so­nal data (data pro­tec­tion impact assessment).
2 It sub­mits any inten­ded pro­ce­s­sing of per­so­nal data with par­ti­cu­lar risks for the fun­da­men­tal rights of the data sub­jects in advan­ce to the data pro­tec­tion offi­cer for review (pri­or check).
§ 11 Avo­id­ance of per­so­nal reference
1 The public body shall design data pro­ce­s­sing systems and pro­grams in such a way that as litt­le per­so­nal data as pos­si­ble is gene­ra­ted that is not neces­sa­ry for the ful­fill­ment of tasks.
2 It dele­tes, anony­mi­zes or pseud­ony­mi­zes such per­so­nal data as soon as and inso­far as this is possible.
§ 12 Infor­ma­ti­on on procurement
1 The public body shall inform the data sub­jects about the pro­cu­re­ment of per­so­nal data. This also applies to pro­cu­re­ment from third parties.
2 The infor­ma­ti­on con­ta­ins details about
a. the respon­si­ble public body,
b. the data obtai­ned or their categories,
c. the legal basis and the pur­po­se of the processing,
d. the data reci­pi­en­ts or the cate­go­ries of data reci­pi­en­ts if the data is dis­c­lo­sed to third parties,
e. the rights of the data subject.
3 The obli­ga­ti­on to pro­vi­de infor­ma­ti­on does not app­ly,
a. if the per­son con­cer­ned alre­a­dy has the infor­ma­ti­on spe­ci­fi­ed in para­graph 2,
b. if the pro­cu­re­ment of per­so­nal data is pro­vi­ded for by law,
c. if the infor­ma­ti­on is not pos­si­ble or would requi­re a dis­pro­por­tio­na­te effort,
d. in the cases pur­su­ant to § 23.
§ 12a Obli­ga­ti­on to report
1 The respon­si­ble public body shall imme­dia­te­ly noti­fy the data pro­tec­tion offi­cer of any unaut­ho­ri­zed pro­ce­s­sing or loss of per­so­nal data if the fun­da­men­tal rights of the data sub­ject are at risk.
2 It shall inform the data sub­ject if the cir­cum­stances so requi­re or if the data pro­tec­tion offi­cer so requests.
3 It may rest­rict the infor­ma­ti­on of the data sub­ject in who­le or in part if the­re is an over­ri­ding public or pri­va­te inte­rest to the contrary.
§ 13 Com­pli­ance with data pro­tec­tion regu­la­ti­ons and qua­li­ty assurance
1 The public body shall ensu­re com­pli­ance with data pro­tec­tion pro­vi­si­ons, in par­ti­cu­lar through orga­nizatio­nal regulations.
2 To ensu­re the qua­li­ty of infor­ma­ti­on pro­ce­s­sing, it may have its pro­ce­du­res, orga­nizati­on and tech­ni­cal faci­li­ties audi­ted and eva­lua­ted by an inde­pen­dent and reco­gnized body.
3 The Govern­ment Coun­cil shall regu­la­te the details in an ordinance.

III. dis­clo­sure of information

§ 14 Infor­ma­ti­on acti­vi­ties ex officio
1 The public body pro­vi­des infor­ma­ti­on about its acti­vi­ties of gene­ral inte­rest on its own initiative.
2 It pro­vi­des infor­ma­ti­on on its struc­tu­re, respon­si­bi­li­ties and cont­act persons.
3 The public body may only pro­vi­de infor­ma­ti­on on pen­ding pro­ce­e­dings if this is neces­sa­ry to cor­rect or avo­id fal­se reports or if imme­dia­te infor­ma­ti­on is requi­red in a par­ti­cu­lar­ly serious or sen­sa­tio­nal case.
4 It shall make a list of its infor­ma­ti­on hol­dings and their pur­po­ses publicly acce­s­si­ble. It iden­ti­fi­es infor­ma­ti­on assets that con­tain per­so­nal data.
§ 15 Media
1 The public body shall take the needs of the media into account as far as pos­si­ble in its infor­ma­ti­on activities.
2 It may pro­vi­de for the accre­di­ta­ti­on of media representatives.
§ Sec­tion 16 Dis­clo­sure of per­so­nal data: a. General
1 The public body dis­c­lo­ses per­so­nal data if
a. aut­ho­ri­zed to do so by a legal provision,
b. the data sub­ject has con­sen­ted in the indi­vi­du­al case or
c. it is indis­pensable in the indi­vi­du­al case to avert an immi­nent dan­ger to life and limb or the neces­sa­ry pro­tec­tion of other essen­ti­al legal inte­rests is to be given hig­her priority.
2 It shall also dis­c­lo­se per­so­nal data to ano­ther public body and to the bodies of other can­tons or the Con­fe­de­ra­ti­on in indi­vi­du­al cases if the body reque­st­ing the per­so­nal data requi­res it to ful­fill its sta­tu­to­ry duties.
§ 17 Dis­clo­sure of per­so­nal data: b. Spe­cial per­so­nal data
1 The public body shall dis­c­lo­se spe­ci­fic per­so­nal data if
a. a suf­fi­ci­ent­ly spe­ci­fic pro­vi­si­on in a for­mal law aut­ho­ri­zes this,
b. the data sub­ject has express­ly con­sen­ted to the dis­clo­sure of spe­cial per­so­nal data in indi­vi­du­al cases, or
c. it is indis­pensable in the indi­vi­du­al case to avert an immi­nent dan­ger to life and limb or the neces­sa­ry pro­tec­tion of other essen­ti­al legal inte­rests is to be given hig­her priority.
2 It shall also dis­c­lo­se spe­cial per­so­nal data to ano­ther public body and to the bodies of other can­tons or the Con­fe­de­ra­ti­on in indi­vi­du­al cases if the body reque­st­ing spe­cial per­so­nal data requi­res it to ful­fill its sta­tu­to­ry duties.
§ 18 Dis­clo­sure of per­so­nal data: c. For non-per­so­nal purposes
1 The public body may dis­c­lo­se per­so­nal data for pro­ce­s­sing for non-per­so­nal pur­po­ses, unless this is exclu­ded by a legal provision.
2 The reci­pi­ent must pro­ve that the per­so­nal data is anony­mi­zed, that no con­clu­si­ons can be drawn about the data sub­jects from the eva­lua­tions and that the ori­gi­nal per­so­nal data is destroy­ed after the evaluation.
§ 19 Dis­clo­sure of per­so­nal data: d. Cross-border
To reci­pi­en­ts not sub­ject to the Coun­cil of Euro­pe Con­ven­ti­on for the Pro­tec­tion of Indi­vi­du­als with regard to Auto­ma­tic Pro­ce­s­sing of Per­so­nal Data, the public body shall dis­c­lo­se per­so­nal data if
a. ade­qua­te pro­tec­tion for the data trans­fer is gua­ran­teed in the reci­pi­ent state,
b. a legal basis per­mits this in order to pro­tect cer­tain inte­rests of the data sub­ject or over­ri­ding public inte­rests, or
c. appro­pria­te con­trac­tu­al safe­guards are put in place by the public body.

IV. Right of access to infor­ma­ti­on and other legal claims

§ 20 Access to information
1 Every per­son has the right to access infor­ma­ti­on held by a public body.
2 Every per­son has the right to access their own per­so­nal data.
3 In admi­ni­stra­ti­ve and admi­ni­stra­ti­ve justi­ce pro­ce­e­dings that have not been legal­ly con­clu­ded, the right of access to infor­ma­ti­on is gover­ned by the appli­ca­ble pro­ce­du­ral law.
§ 21 Pro­tec­tion of per­so­nal data
1 The data sub­ject may request the public body to
a. cor­rects or destroys incor­rect per­so­nal data,
b. refrains from the unlawful pro­ce­s­sing of per­so­nal data,
c. eli­mi­na­tes the con­se­quen­ces of unlawful processing,
d. estab­lishes the unlawful­ness of the processing.
2 If the cor­rec­tion or dele­ti­on of per­so­nal data is reque­sted and neither its accu­ra­cy nor inac­cu­ra­cy can be estab­lished, the public body shall add a note sta­ting that the per­so­nal data is dis­pu­ted. It rest­ricts the processing.
§ 22 Blocking of per­so­nal data
1 The data sub­ject may have the dis­clo­sure of their per­so­nal data to pri­va­te par­ties blocked if the public body can dis­c­lo­se per­so­nal data wit­hout pre­con­di­ti­ons on the basis of a spe­cial sta­tu­to­ry provision.
2 The public body shall dis­c­lo­se per­so­nal data despi­te blocking if the reque­st­ing per­son pro­ves that the blocking pre­vents them from pur­suing their own rights against the data subject.

V. Rest­ric­tions in indi­vi­du­al cases

§ Sec­tion 23 Balan­cing of interests
1 The public body shall refu­se to dis­c­lo­se infor­ma­ti­on in who­le or in part or post­po­ne it if this is con­tra­ry to a legal pro­vi­si­on or an over­ri­ding public or pri­va­te interest.
2 A public inte­rest exists in par­ti­cu­lar if
a. infor­ma­ti­on posi­ti­ons in con­tract negotiations,
b. the dis­clo­sure of the infor­ma­ti­on impairs the opi­ni­on-forming pro­cess of the public body,
c. the dis­clo­sure of the infor­ma­ti­on jeo­par­di­zes the effec­ti­ve­ness of inve­sti­ga­ti­ve, safe­ty or super­vi­so­ry measures,
d. the dis­clo­sure of the infor­ma­ti­on affects rela­ti­ons bet­ween the com­mu­nes, with ano­ther can­ton, with the Con­fe­de­ra­ti­on or with other countries,
e. the dis­clo­sure impairs the tar­ge­ted imple­men­ta­ti­on of spe­ci­fic offi­ci­al measures.
3 A pri­va­te inte­rest exists in par­ti­cu­lar if the pri­va­cy of third par­ties is impai­red by the dis­clo­sure of the information.

VI. pro­ce­du­re for access to information

§ 24 Application
1 Anyo­ne who wants access to infor­ma­ti­on in accordance with § 20 para­graph 1 must sub­mit a writ­ten request.
2 The public body may pro­vi­de infor­ma­ti­on ver­bal­ly in respon­se to oral inquiries.
§ 25 Exami­na­ti­on of the application
1 The public body may reject a request if it rela­tes to infor­ma­ti­on that is alre­a­dy in the public domain and is available in an appro­pria­te man­ner. This source must be indicated.
2 If the pro­ce­s­sing of the request cau­ses the public body a dis­pro­por­tio­na­te effort, it may make access to the infor­ma­ti­on depen­dent on pro­of of a legi­ti­ma­te inte­rest on the part of the per­son making the request.
§ 26 Con­sul­ta­ti­on of affec­ted third parties
1 If the public body wis­hes to grant access to the infor­ma­ti­on and the request con­cerns per­so­nal data or infor­ma­ti­on clas­si­fi­ed as con­fi­den­ti­al, the public body shall give the third par­ties con­cer­ned the oppor­tu­ni­ty to com­ment within a rea­sonable peri­od of time.
2 If the request con­cerns spe­cial per­so­nal data, the public body shall reject the request if the third par­ties con­cer­ned do not express­ly con­sent to access.
§ 27 Disposition
1 The public body issues an order if it wis­hes to refu­se, rest­rict or post­po­ne access to the reque­sted information.
2 If it wis­hes to grant access to infor­ma­ti­on con­tra­ry to the wis­hes of third par­ties, it shall inform the third par­ties con­cer­ned of this by means of an order.
§ 28 Time limits
1 The public body shall grant access to the infor­ma­ti­on within 30 days of rece­ipt of the request or issue an order rest­ric­ting the right of access.
2 If the public body is unable to meet this dead­line, it shall inform the appli­cant befo­re the dead­line expi­res, sta­ting the rea­sons, when the decis­i­on on the appli­ca­ti­on will be available.
§ 29 Fees and charges
1 The public body char­ges a fee for pro­ce­s­sing appli­ca­ti­ons from pri­va­te individuals.
2 No fee is char­ged
a. when access to infor­ma­ti­on requi­res litt­le effort,
b. for the pro­ce­s­sing of appli­ca­ti­ons rela­ting to your own per­so­nal data,
c. if the appli­ca­ti­on ser­ves sci­en­ti­fic pur­po­ses and the results of the pro­ce­s­sing are expec­ted to be of bene­fit to the public.
3 If the pro­ce­s­sing of the appli­ca­ti­on invol­ves con­sidera­ble costs, the public body shall inform the appli­cant accor­din­gly. In this case, it may demand an appro­pria­te advan­ce payment.
4 If infor­ma­ti­on is sui­ta­ble for com­mer­cial use, a fee may be char­ged depen­ding on the market.

VII. Data Pro­tec­tion Offi­cer or Representative

§ 30 Posi­ti­on and salary
1 The Can­to­nal Coun­cil elects a data pro­tec­tion offi­cer for a term of office of four years.
2 The sala­ry of the data pro­tec­tion offi­cer cor­re­sponds to 83% of the maxi­mum amount of the hig­hest sala­ry class of can­to­nal employees.
3 The data pro­tec­tion offi­cer is inde­pen­dent. He or she is admi­ni­stra­tively assi­gned to the manage­ment of the Can­to­nal Council.
§ 31 Personnel
1 The per­son­nel law of the can­ton shall app­ly to the appoin­tee and his or her staff. The pro­vi­si­ons of this Act remain reserved.
2 The Com­mis­sio­ner is respon­si­ble for the recruit­ment and pro­mo­ti­on of his or her staff within the frame­work of the bud­get appro­ved by the Can­to­nal Council.
3 *Can­cel­led.
§ Sec­tion 32 Bud­ge­ting, con­trol­ling and accounting
1 The Offi­cer is sub­ject to the Con­trol­ling and Accoun­ting Act (CRG) and the imple­men­ting decrees of the Govern­ment Coun­cil to this Act.
2 He or she has the same spen­ding powers as the Govern­ment Coun­cil. §§ Sec­tions 19 – 25 CRG app­ly by analogy.
3 The com­mis­sio­ner shall keep his or her own accounts. He or she sub­mits an annu­al over­view of the deve­lo­p­ment of ser­vices and finan­ces, a draft bud­get and the accounts to the Can­to­nal Council.
§ 33 Repre­sen­ta­ti­ves in muni­ci­pa­li­ties and organizations
1 The muni­ci­pa­li­ties and the orga­nizati­ons pur­su­ant to § 3 may appoint their own repre­sen­ta­ti­ves. The can­to­nal govern­ment may obli­ge muni­ci­pa­li­ties with at least 50,000 inha­bi­tants to do so.
2 The muni­ci­pa­li­ties and the orga­nizati­ons pur­su­ant to § 3 shall regu­la­te the elec­tion and orga­nizati­on inde­pendent­ly. They shall ensu­re that the com­mis­sio­ners have the neces­sa­ry pro­fes­sio­nal qua­li­fi­ca­ti­ons and are inde­pen­dent in the exer­cise of their duties and powers. The can­to­nal com­mis­sio­ner shall exer­cise over­all supervision.
§ 34 Tasks
The com­mis­sio­ner or the com­mis­sio­ner
a. sup­ports and advi­ses public bodies on data pro­tec­tion issues,
b. advi­ses pri­va­te indi­vi­du­als on their rights,
c. moni­tors the appli­ca­ti­on of data pro­tec­tion regulations,
d. media­tes bet­ween data sub­jects and public bodies in dis­pu­tes con­cer­ning data protection,
e. informs the public about data pro­tec­tion issues,
f. asses­ses decrees and pro­jects rela­ting to data protection,
g. offers trai­ning and fur­ther edu­ca­ti­on in data pro­tec­tion issues.
§ Sec­tion 35 Con­trol powers
1 Irre­spec­ti­ve of any con­fi­den­tia­li­ty obli­ga­ti­on, the aut­ho­ri­zed repre­sen­ta­ti­ve may obtain infor­ma­ti­on about the pro­ce­s­sing of data from public bodies and com­mis­sio­ned third par­ties in accordance with § 6, inspect the data and have pro­ce­s­sing car­ri­ed out, inso­far as this is neces­sa­ry for his or her activities.
2 The public bodies and aut­ho­ri­zed third par­ties shall coope­ra­te in estab­li­shing the facts of the case.
§ 36 Recommendations
1 If the Com­mis­sio­ner iden­ti­fi­es a breach of data pro­tec­tion pro­vi­si­ons, he or she shall make a recom­men­da­ti­on to the public body as to what mea­su­res should be taken.
2 If the public body does not fol­low a recom­men­da­ti­on, it shall inform the data pro­tec­tion offi­cer, sta­ting the reasons.
§ Sec­tion 36a Admi­ni­stra­ti­ve measures
1 If the public body does not fol­low a recom­men­da­ti­on in the event of a signi­fi­cant breach of data pro­tec­tion pro­vi­si­ons, the Com­mis­sio­ner may order the pro­ce­s­sing to be adapt­ed, inter­rupt­ed or dis­con­tin­ued in who­le or in part and the per­so­nal data to be dele­ted or destroy­ed in who­le or in part.
2 The public body con­cer­ned may appeal against rulings by the appointee(s) to the Admi­ni­stra­ti­ve Court. The par­ties are the appoin­tee and the public body concerned.
§ Sec­tion 37 Cooperation
The com­mis­sio­ner shall coope­ra­te with the bodies of the other can­tons, the Con­fe­de­ra­ti­on and for­eign count­ries that per­form the same tasks in order to ful­fill the con­trol task pur­su­ant to § 35. 
§ 38 Duty of confidentiality
The com­mis­sio­ner and the employees are obli­ged to main­tain the same con­fi­den­tia­li­ty with regard to infor­ma­ti­on of which they beco­me awa­re in the cour­se of their work as the public body hand­ling the matter. 
§ Sec­tion 39 Reporting
The com­mis­sio­ner shall peri­odi­cal­ly report to the elec­to­ral body on the scope and focus of acti­vi­ties, on important fin­dings and assess­ments, and on the effect of the law. The report shall be published. 
§ Sec­tion 39a Legal protection
1 Appeals may be lodged with the Admi­ni­stra­ti­ve Dele­ga­ti­on of the Exe­cu­ti­ve Board of the Can­to­nal Coun­cil against orders issued by the Com­mis­sio­ner in per­son­nel or admi­ni­stra­ti­ve matters.
2 The duty of con­fi­den­tia­li­ty pur­su­ant to § 38 also applies to the appeal bodies.
3 In all other respects, legal pro­tec­tion is gover­ned by the Admi­ni­stra­ti­on of Justi­ce Act of May 24, 1959.

VIII Penal provisions

§ 40 Pro­ce­s­sing of per­so­nal data in breach of contract
1 Anyo­ne who uses per­so­nal data for them­sel­ves or others or dis­c­lo­ses such data to others as an aut­ho­ri­zed per­son in accordance with Artic­le 6 wit­hout the express aut­ho­rizati­on of the com­mis­sio­ning public body shall be lia­ble to a fine.
2 The inve­sti­ga­ti­on and assess­ment of inf­rin­ge­ments is the respon­si­bi­li­ty of the governor’s offices.

IX. Final and tran­si­tio­nal provisions

§ Sec­tion 41 Tran­si­tio­nal law
The public body may pro­cess or dis­c­lo­se infor­ma­ti­on con­tai­ning spe­cial per­so­nal data that exists when this Act comes into force for five years after this Act comes into force wit­hout the requi­re­ments of sec­tion 8 para­graph 2 or sec­tion 17 para­graph 1 let­ter a being met. 
§ Sec­tion 42 Adap­t­ati­on of designations
1 In the fol­lo­wing laws, the term «Data Pro­tec­tion Act» or «Act on the Pro­tec­tion of Per­so­nal Data» is repla­ced by the term «Act on Infor­ma­ti­on and Data Pro­tec­tion»:
a. Law on the out­sour­cing of IT ser­vices: Sec­tion 3 (1) and (2),
b. Tax Act: § 122 para­graph 2.
2 In the fol­lo­wing laws, the term «par­ti­cu­lar­ly sen­si­ti­ve per­so­nal data» or «par­ti­cu­lar­ly sen­si­ti­ve data» is repla­ced by the term «spe­cial per­so­nal data»:
a. Law on the out­sour­cing of IT ser­vices: § 3 para. 1,
b. Finan­cial Con­trol Act: § 25 para­graph 2.
§ Sec­tion 43 Repeal of pre­vious law
Upon ent­ry into force of this Act, the Data Pro­tec­tion Act of June 6, 1993 shall be repealed. 
§ Sec­tion 44 Adap­t­ati­on of other decrees
The fol­lo­wing laws are amen­ded as fol­lows:
a. Law on the Muni­ci­pal System (Muni­ci­pa­li­ties Act) of June 6, 1926: …
b. Act on the Orga­nizati­on and Rules of Pro­ce­du­re of the Can­to­nal Coun­cil (Can­to­nal Coun­cil Act) of 5 April 1981: …
c. Law on Legal Pro­tec­tion in Admi­ni­stra­ti­ve Mat­ters (Admi­ni­stra­ti­ve Juris­dic­tion Act) of May 24, 1959: …
d. Law on the Employment Rela­ti­on­ship of Sta­te Per­son­nel (Per­son­nel Act) of Sep­tem­ber 27, 1998: …
e. Law on the Insu­rance Fund for Sta­te Per­son­nel of June 6, 1993: …
f. Archi­ves Act of Sep­tem­ber 24, 1995: …
g. Law on public pas­sen­ger trans­port of March 6, 1988: …
h. Con­trol­ling and Accoun­ting Act (CRG) of Janu­ary 9, 2006: …