Take-Aways (AI)
  • The coope­ra­ti­on bet­ween FINMA, the PUE and the FOPH sin­ce 2020 is legal­ly per­mis­si­ble and has impro­ved the super­vi­si­on of sup­ple­men­ta­ry health insurance.
  • Due to the new DPA, the GPK‑S recom­mends cla­ri­fy­ing the legal basis (e.g. Art. 39 FINMASA) for the dis­clo­sure of data rele­vant to trade secrets.

The Con­trol Com­mit­tees (CC) and the Con­trol Dele­ga­ti­on (CCDel) of the Fede­ral Assem­bly have published the 2025 Annu­al Report (BBl 2026 396). Among other things, the report on an inve­sti­ga­ti­on by the GPK‑S into super­vi­so­ry acti­vi­ties in the area of sup­ple­men­ta­ry health insu­rance is interesting.

Sin­ce 2020, the Swiss Finan­cial Mar­ket Super­vi­so­ry Aut­ho­ri­ty (FINMA), pri­ce moni­to­ring (PUE) and the Fede­ral Office of Public Health (BAG) based on a Memo­ran­dum of Under­stan­ding (MoU). The que­sti­on was whe­ther the­re was a suf­fi­ci­ent legal basis for this. An expert opi­ni­on pre­pared by the Fede­ral Office of Justi­ce (FOJ) con­firm­ed that the pre­vious exch­an­ge took place on a suf­fi­ci­ent legal basis, Art. 39 para. 1 and 1bis FINMASA, Art. 34 para. 5 KVAG and Art. 62 KVAV:

On behalf of the Fede­ral Coun­cil, the PUE and the FOPH inten­si­fi­ed their coope­ra­ti­on with FINMA in the area of sup­ple­men­ta­ry health insu­rance and for­ma­li­zed it from 2020 in a Memo­ran­dum of Under­stan­ding (MoU). The GPK‑S took note of the over­all posi­ti­ve results of the increa­sed coope­ra­ti­on – par­ti­cu­lar­ly in the area of on-site inspec­tions and the super­vi­si­on of ser­vice pro­vi­ders’ tariffs. The FOJ’s legal inve­sti­ga­ti­ons also con­firm­ed that the inten­si­fi­ca­ti­on of coope­ra­ti­on bet­ween the three aut­ho­ri­ties to date was lawful. The appli­ca­ble law gives FINMA, the PUE and the FOPH suf­fi­ci­ent lee­way to exch­an­ge infor­ma­ti­on in the form of infor­ma­ti­on and docu­ments as pro­vi­ded for in their MoU.

With the new DSG Trade secrets of legal enti­ties as par­ti­cu­lar­ly sen­si­ti­ve data within the mea­ning of Art. 57r para. 2 let. b RVOG. The dis­clo­sure of such data by fede­ral bodies requi­res a Basis in a law in the for­mal sen­se requi­red (see here):

Whe­ther the exi­sting legal basis – in par­ti­cu­lar Art. 39 FINMASA – is suf­fi­ci­ent for every exch­an­ge bet­ween FINMA, the PUE and the FOPH is unclear, which is why the CPC‑S recom­mends that an expli­cit pro­vi­si­on on data dis­clo­sure be inclu­ded in a future revi­si­on of FINMASA:

Howe­ver, the Com­mis­si­on found that it would be useful to re-exami­ne the legal basis for the dis­clo­sure of legal enti­ties’ data rela­ting to trade secrets. With the ent­ry into force of the new Data Pro­tec­tion Act (DPA) on 1 Sep­tem­ber 2023, the requi­re­ments for the stan­dard level of the legal basis requi­red for the dis­clo­sure of such data were increa­sed. Sin­ce then, this data has been con­side­red par­ti­cu­lar­ly wort­hy of pro­tec­tion within the mea­ning of Artic­le 57r para­graph 2 let­ter b of the Govern­ment and Admi­ni­stra­ti­on Orga­nizati­on Act (RVOG), so that fede­ral bodies may only dis­c­lo­se this data if «a law in the for­mal sen­se pro­vi­des for this» (Art. 57s para. 2 RVOG). Against this back­ground and depen­ding on the future requi­re­ments for coope­ra­ti­on bet­ween FINMA, the PUE and the FOPH, it should the­r­e­fo­re be exami­ned whe­ther a cor­re­spon­ding pro­vi­si­on should be inclu­ded in Artic­le 39 FINMASA. The SIF has assu­red the GPK‑S that it will exami­ne the cor­re­spon­ding need for action on the basis of the FOJ’s legal ana­ly­ses in a future revi­si­on of the law.