Take-Aways (AI)
  • Data pro­tec­tion con­cerns: The Fede­ral Data Pro­tec­tion Com­mis­sio­ner war­ned against using Micro­soft 365 due to pos­si­ble data access out­side Switzerland.
  • DDPS decis­i­on and cri­ti­cism: The DDPS used Micro­soft 365 despi­te expert war­nings, which led to public and poli­ti­cal criticism.
  • Secu­ri­ty risk for the army: Using a US plat­form can mean secu­ri­ty and depen­den­cy risks for mili­ta­ry information.

Inter­pel­la­ti­on Addor (23.4363): Micro­soft 365 – a poten­ti­al weak point in our armed forces?

Sub­mit­ted text

Sin­ce Novem­ber 2023, the com­man­ders of divi­si­ons and troop units in our armed forces have had Micro­soft 365 at their dis­po­sal for plan­ning refres­her cour­ses and for off-duty tasks.

1. is it true that the Fede­ral Data Pro­tec­tion and Infor­ma­ti­on Com­mis­sio­ner war­ned the Fede­ral Depart­ment of Defen­se, Civil Pro­tec­tion and Sport (DDPS) in vain not to use this Ame­ri­can pro­duct? If so, why did the DDPS igno­re this warning?

2. what is the Fede­ral Council’s posi­ti­on on the many cri­ti­cisms that this decis­i­on has pro­vo­ked, in par­ti­cu­lar tho­se expres­sed in this artic­le by Heidi.News (https://www.heidi.news/cyber/l‑armee-suisse-passe-chez-microsoft-et-une-fois-de-plus-le-pays-se-rend-vulnerable)?

3. is Micro­soft 365 as a col­la­bo­ra­ti­ve plat­form of the mili­ta­ry a poten­ti­al vul­nerabi­li­ty of our army that can­not be accepted?