Take-Aways (AI)
  • Cyber­crime is on the rise and affects pri­va­te indi­vi­du­als, young peo­p­le and com­pa­nies with a wide ran­ge of offenses.
  • Law enforce­ment agen­ci­es are adap­ting; ongo­ing tech­ni­cal know­ledge and inter­na­tio­nal coope­ra­ti­on are key.
  • Con­fe­de­ra­ti­on and can­tons work clo­se­ly: NEDIK, Cyber­board and KGCy streng­then coor­di­na­ti­on and infor­ma­ti­on exchange.
  • Trai­ning is being inten­si­fi­ed; can­to­nal insti­tu­ti­ons, SPI, uni­ver­si­ties and col­leges offer spe­cia­li­zed pro­grams and e‑learning.

Inter­pel­la­ti­on Bregy (19.3288): Cyber­crime – what is the sta­tus of law enforce­ment trai­ning in particular?

Sub­mit­ted text

Cyber­crime con­ti­nues to increa­se. The types of offen­ses are very diver­se and ran­ge from bul­ly­ing, child por­no­gra­phy, traf­ficking in drugs and wea­pons to pro­fes­sio­nal­ly orga­ni­zed invest­ment and order fraud. Law enforce­ment agen­ci­es are con­fron­ted with major chal­lenges in a rapid­ly chan­ging envi­ron­ment. In addi­ti­on to child­ren and young peo­p­le, ordi­na­ry Inter­net users are now among the vic­tims, as are com­pa­nies of various sizes. The Fede­ral Coun­cil is the­r­e­fo­re asked to ans­wer the fol­lo­wing questions:

1) How does the Fede­ral Coun­cil assess the deve­lo­p­ment of cyber­crime and its pro­se­cu­ti­on in Switzerland?

2. are law enforce­ment agen­ci­es pre­pared for this deve­lo­p­ment and, in par­ti­cu­lar, is their trai­ning in this area adequate?

3. what can the Fede­ral Coun­cil do to impro­ve the fight against cyber­crime and its prosecution?

4) What form could coope­ra­ti­on or sha­ring with the can­tons take, inclu­ding in the area of trai­ning for spe­cia­li­zed law enforce­ment agencies?

5. how could the trai­ning of law enforce­ment agen­ci­es in the area of cyber­crime be impro­ved, if at all?

6 Would a tar­ge­ted trai­ning pro­gram under the auspi­ces of the fede­ral govern­ment be a pos­si­ble solution?

State­ment of the Fede­ral Coun­cil from 22.5.2019

1 / 2 Incre­a­sing digi­tizati­on and the use of digi­tal means of com­mu­ni­ca­ti­on are lea­ding to a rise in digi­tal forms of crime. Even clas­sic crime (such as cri­mes against life and limb) now often inclu­des an elec­tro­nic com­po­nent, for exam­p­le in the form of elec­tro­ni­cal­ly available evi­dence. Swiss law enforce­ment is adap­ting to the chan­ging con­di­ti­ons. In order to con­ti­n­ue to keep pace with deve­lo­p­ments, spe­cial tech­ni­cal know­ledge as well as clo­se natio­nal and inter­na­tio­nal coope­ra­ti­on with the various part­ners are of cen­tral importance. Con­ti­nuous trai­ning of pro­se­cu­tors and poli­ce is the­r­e­fo­re essen­ti­al. For this rea­son, law enforce­ment agen­ci­es are pla­cing an empha­sis on deve­lo­ping and expan­ding trai­ning. Cf. respon­ses 5/6.

3 / 4 The Fede­ral Coun­cil pro­mo­tes and sup­ports the net­wor­king of exi­sting capa­bi­li­ties and resour­ces and the exch­an­ge of cri­mi­nal intel­li­gence bet­ween natio­nal and inter­na­tio­nal part­ners. Alre­a­dy today, the law enforce­ment agen­ci­es of the can­tons and the Con­fe­de­ra­ti­on work clo­se­ly tog­e­ther in the fight against digi­tal crime. The “Net­work Inve­sti­ga­ti­ve Sup­port Digi­tal Crime Fight­ing” (NEDIK), foun­ded by the Con­fe­rence of Can­to­nal Poli­ce Com­man­ders (KKPKS), ser­ves as an ope­ra­tio­nal plat­form to inten­si­fy poli­ce coope­ra­ti­on bet­ween the can­tons and the fede­ral govern­ment. Ano­ther important instru­ment is the Cyber­board, whe­re poli­ce forces and public pro­se­cu­tors of the Con­fe­de­ra­ti­on and the can­tons work tog­e­ther. In addi­ti­on, the new cyber­se­cu­ri­ty core group (KGCy) deci­ded by the Fede­ral Coun­cil and the Fede­ral Council’s cyber­se­cu­ri­ty com­mit­tee can coor­di­na­te and steer natio­nal mea­su­res in the event of cyber-rela­ted crises.

5 / 6 The trai­ning of law enforce­ment aut­ho­ri­ties (poli­ce and public pro­se­cu­tors) in digi­tal crime will be suc­ce­s­si­ve­ly inten­si­fi­ed and adapt­ed to the cur­rent needs of law enforce­ment. Trai­ning is pri­ma­ri­ly the respon­si­bi­li­ty of the can­tons. For exam­p­le, the Swiss PoI­ice Insti­tu­te (SPI) is respon­si­ble for estab­li­shing and expan­ding a Switz­er­land-wide trai­ning pro­gram against cyber­crime. A working group with appro­pria­te spe­cia­lists has been set up spe­ci­fi­cal­ly for this pur­po­se. The e‑learning modu­le deve­lo­ped by the SPI, which covers the basics of fight­ing digi­tal crime, has alre­a­dy been com­ple­ted by over 15,000 poli­ce offi­cers. In the French-spea­king can­tons, the “Eco­le roman­de de la Magi­stra­tu­re péna­le” is ent­ru­sted with the trai­ning of public pro­se­cu­tors as a com­pe­tence cen­ter of the “Hau­te éco­le de gesti­on Arc” (HE-Arc). Cyber­crime is one of the trai­ning modu­les. The HE-Arc also offers trai­ning for other law enforce­ment spe­cia­lists, inclu­ding the poli­ce. In the Ger­man-spea­king can­tons of Switz­er­land, the Aca­de­my of Public Pro­se­cu­tors at the Uni­ver­si­ty of Lucer­ne offers simi­lar trai­ning for public pro­se­cu­tors. At the Uni­ver­si­ty of Lau­sanne, the­re is a master’s in foren­sics with a cour­se on cyber­crime desi­gned for future inve­sti­ga­tors. In addi­ti­on, ETHZ and EPFL offer a master’s in cyber­se­cu­ri­ty. The­se new offe­rings fill an important gap in prevention.