Inter­pel­la­ti­on Dobler (22.4097): Amend­ments to the ordi­nan­ce on data deli­very obli­ga­ti­on and data dis­clo­sure. The poten­ti­al of digi­tizati­on and data manage­ment in heal­th­ca­re must be much bet­ter exploited!

Inter­pel­la­ti­on Dobler (22.4097): Amend­ments to the ordi­nan­ce on data deli­very obli­ga­ti­on and data dis­clo­sure. The poten­ti­al of digi­tizati­on and data manage­ment in heal­th­ca­re must be much bet­ter exploited!

Sub­mit­ted text

Digi­tizati­on and data manage­ment are a major chall­enge in the Swiss heal­th­ca­re system and the­re is a con­sidera­ble need for action. The enorm­ous amounts of exi­sting data in the Swiss heal­th­ca­re system must be used signi­fi­cant­ly bet­ter for system development.

I would ask the Fede­ral Coun­cil to ans­wer the fol­lo­wing questions:

1. is the Fede­ral Coun­cil pre­pared to revi­se the amend­ments it has sub­mit­ted to the KVV; KVAV and KLV con­cer­ning the obli­ga­ti­on of insu­r­ers to sup­p­ly data and the dis­clo­sure of data by ser­vice pro­vi­ders in the case of out­pa­ti­ent tre­at­ment befo­re they are adopted, in order to enable the best pos­si­ble use of health data? If so, how?

2. how will it adapt or impro­ve the draft after eva­lua­ting the consultation?

3 The eva­lua­ti­on and pre­sen­ta­ti­on of the data would have to be regu­la­ted by the admi­ni­stra­ti­on in the pre­sent reform packa­ge. Why is this not the case?

4 In order to crea­te the hig­hest pos­si­ble trans­pa­ren­cy, to pro­mo­te the long-deman­ded qua­li­ty com­pe­ti­ti­on and to increa­se the free­dom of choice of pati­ents, it is of cru­cial importance to coll­ect and pre­sent data of insu­r­ers and ser­vice pro­vi­ders in a com­pa­ra­ble form (bench­mar­kab­le). Why are the­se points not men­tio­ned in a tar­get stan­dard at the begin­ning of Artic­le 28 KVV and Artic­le 62a KVAV?

5 As part of the refor­mu­la­ti­on of Artic­le 21 KVG, some of the objec­ti­ves of data trans­fer were sti­pu­la­ted in the law. In the new ver­si­on of Artic­le 28 KVV, lit. a. to g. have been remo­ved from para­graph 1. Why have some important cri­te­ria for defi­ning the neces­sa­ry data now dis­ap­peared from the legis­la­ti­on, which are miss­ing from Artic­le 21 KVG?

Justi­fi­ca­ti­on

From March 11 to June 16, 2022, the Fede­ral Coun­cil issued a Con­sul­ta­ti­on on chan­ges to KVV, KVAV and KLV was car­ri­ed out. The main focus was on the obli­ga­ti­on of insu­r­ers to pro­vi­de data and the dis­clo­sure of data by heal­th­ca­re pro­vi­ders in the case of out­pa­ti­ent treatment.

Digi­tizati­on and data manage­ment are a major chall­enge in the Swiss heal­th­ca­re system and the­re is a con­sidera­ble need for action.

This revi­si­on is the­r­e­fo­re to be wel­co­med, but the poten­ti­al offe­red in both topics is far from being exploi­ted by the pre­sent draft regu­la­ti­ons, which is regrettable.

The enorm­ous amounts of exi­sting data in the Swiss heal­th­ca­re system must be signi­fi­cant­ly bet­ter uti­li­zed for system development.

The­r­e­fo­re, the Fede­ral Coun­cil must fur­ther deve­lop the draft regu­la­ti­ons in this sense.

Aut­ho­ri­ty

Area

Topics

Rela­ted articles

Sub­scri­be