Take-Aways (AI)
  • Cloud-based IT ser­vices offer gre­at poten­ti­al for avai­la­bi­li­ty, secu­ri­ty, sca­la­bi­li­ty and cost reduc­tion in the heal­th­ca­re sector.
  • The cur­rent legal situa­ti­on and dif­fe­ring can­to­nal requi­re­ments make it dif­fi­cult to imple­ment data pro­tec­tion uni­form­ly and hin­der inno­va­ti­on throug­hout Switzerland.
  • The­re is a con­cre­te need for har­mo­nizati­on; the fede­ral govern­ment should work with data pro­tec­tion experts and ICT experts to deve­lop uni­form imple­men­ta­ti­on aids/guidelines.
  • Issues rela­ting to uni­form fede­ral respon­si­bi­li­ty, DSG adap­t­ati­on and a list of cer­ti­fi­ed cloud ser­vices with inde­pen­dent audits must be clarified.

Inter­pel­la­ti­on Häs­sig (25.3836): Standardize/harmonize data pro­tec­tion rules in hos­pi­tals to pro­mo­te innovation

Sub­mit­ted text

Cloud-based IT ser­vices offer enorm­ous poten­ti­al in the heal­th­ca­re sec­tor for sta­ble, secu­re and cost-effec­ti­ve solu­ti­ons. Nowa­days, sca­lable soft­ware is deve­lo­ped almost exclu­si­ve­ly in the cloud. In addi­ti­on, tech­no­lo­gies and appli­ca­ti­ons can be adapt­ed from other indu­stries, which redu­ces deve­lo­p­ment costs and increa­ses sca­la­bi­li­ty. Cloud ser­vices are also rele­vant to qua­li­ty, as the gene­ral avai­la­bi­li­ty, secu­ri­ty, laten­cy and relia­bi­li­ty are usual­ly bet­ter than with self-deve­lo­ped appli­ca­ti­ons that are hosted in in-hou­se IT infrastructures.

The cur­rent legal situa­ti­on makes the use of cloud-based solu­ti­ons more dif­fi­cult. Health data is pro­tec­ted by the Fede­ral Act on Data Pro­tec­tion (FADP) and the can­to­nal data pro­tec­tion laws and must be pro­ce­s­sed in accordance with their prin­ci­ples. Hos­pi­tals sub­ject to public law and hos­pi­tals with a can­to­nal ser­vice man­da­te must act in accordance with the data pro­tec­tion regu­la­ti­ons appli­ca­ble in their respec­ti­ve can­ton. Howe­ver, the can­to­nal and, in some cases, com­mu­nal prin­ci­ples and requi­re­ments vary great­ly. As a result, imple­men­ta­ti­on by the data pro­tec­tion offi­cers is incon­si­stent. This situa­ti­on is par­ti­cu­lar­ly dif­fi­cult for heal­th­ca­re insti­tu­ti­ons ope­ra­ting throug­hout Switz­er­land and hin­ders innovation.

In view of this pro­blem, I put the fol­lo­wing que­sti­ons to the Fede­ral Council:

  1. Does the Fede­ral Coun­cil share the view that the imple­men­ta­ti­on of data pro­tec­tion Need for har­mo­nizati­on in the area of clouds in the heal­th­ca­re sec­tor e.g. with regard to uni­form infor­ma­ti­on secu­ri­ty requi­re­ments for hos­pi­tals and care faci­li­ties or data sto­rage in Switzerland?
  2. Is the Fede­ral Coun­cil rea­dy, tog­e­ther with data pro­tec­tion experts and ICT spe­cia­lists, uni­form gui­de­lines for the imple­men­ta­ti­on of (imple­men­ta­ti­on aid/guidelines) in order to pro­mo­te inno­va­ti­on? Are the­re any fede­ral govern­ment chan­nels that can be used?
  3. Is it con­sti­tu­tio­nal pos­si­ble to make all cloud ser­vices in the heal­th­ca­re sec­tor sub­ject to the natio­nal fede­ral law on data pro­tec­tion? If so, is the Fede­ral Coun­cil pre­pared to amend the FADP?
  4. What does the Fede­ral Coun­cil think of the idea of publi­shing a list of cer­ti­fi­ed cloud ser­vices ope­ra­ting in the heal­th­ca­re sec­tor? Which inde­pen­dent body could car­ry out audits and publish such a list?