Submitted text
An interdepartmental working group (IDWG) must report to the Federal Council on how to deal with the risks arising from the Switzerland’s digital dependence on certain companies resulted. In his response to my Motion 25.4120 «Digital sovereignty. Support for Swiss economic players», the Federal Council writes that it is not currently planning any economic measures to support Swiss economic players active in the field of digitalization, but that there are nevertheless opportunities to strengthen digital sovereignty in a targeted manner, for example by defining special technical specifications.
Against this background, I put the following questions to the Federal Council:
- The Federal Council mentions the potential costs of government economic measures. Can it also Analysis of the economic costs what will happen if it fails to act? Because the increasing dependence on foreign providers in critical areas (cloud, software, data and digital infrastructure) is associated with economic and strategic risks as well as security risks. If yes, by when? If not, why not?
- Over what period and according to what criteria is the Strategic benchmark «costs and profitability», as defined in the Digital Guidelines for Digital Sovereignty in the Federal Administration of December 11, 2025?
- In 2026, there will still be no legal requirements for data centers in Switzerland in the area of «Green IT». In contrast to the EU’s Energy Efficiency Directive, which requires all data centers with an output of 500 kW or more to submit a report, Switzerland has no corresponding requirements. What does the Federal Council intend to do to ensure that this legal loophole cannot be exploited by less efficient providers?
- The importance of digitalization issues is increasing, and with it the need for the federal offices to coordinate with each other. coordinate. Does the Federal Council intend to appoint a contact person for political legal issues to take up this strategic challenge?
- Which Adjustments to public procurement law would it be necessary to include technical criteria that structurally favor independent actors, in particular by requiring exit strategies and better evaluating solutions that do not require technological customer lock-in and remote access to shut down critical infrastructure components, or by giving lower ratings to practices that lead to greater dependencies in the long term?