KGer FR: Dif­fe­ren­tia­ti­on of data pro­ce­s­sing by third par­ties on behalf of the imple­men­ting body from data pro­ce­s­sing on behalf of pri­va­te per­sons and from data disclosure.

Art. 53, 84 f., 97a, 102, 102a and 112 para. 3 and 4 UVG; Art. 55 and 57 UVV; Art. 125 para. 1 aUW; Art. 3 lit. e andf, 14, 16 para. 1
and 19 FADP; Art. 22 FADP; Art. 320 SCC – Con­di­ti­ons under which the UVG imple­men­ting body may have per­so­nal data pro­ce­s­sed by third par­ties wit­hout brea­ching its duty of con­fi­den­tia­li­ty. Dif­fe­ren­tia­ti­on of data pro­ce­s­sing by third par­ties on behalf of the imple­men­ting body from data pro­ce­s­sing on behalf of pri­va­te per­sons and from data disclosure.

In the spe­ci­fic case, the invol­vement of an expert for a bio­me­cha­ni­cal acci­dent report was permissible.
PDF: [pdf-embedder url=“http://datenrecht.ch/wp-content/uploads/2016/02/2001.10.31 – 012.pdf”]