Cri­ti­cism of the draft DSG

In today’s NZZ Beat Rudin, Bru­no Bae­ris­wyl and Clau­dia Mund, the can­to­nal data pro­tec­tion com­mis­sio­ners of the can­tons of Basel-Stadt, Zurich and Zug, have joi­n­ed forces under the ambi­guous tit­le “The revi­sed data pro­tec­tion law is not a sove­reign solu­ti­on” cri­ti­cal of the draft of the FDPA expres­sed. They descri­be the draft of the FDPA as an “extre­me­ly com­pli­ca­ted set of rules” that is dif­fi­cult to under­stand for tho­se affec­ted as well as for com­pa­nies. Accor­ding to the aut­hors, the Fede­ral Coun­cil could have taken more time and more free­dom; the imple­men­ta­ti­on dead­line of the Schen­gen Agree­ment would have allo­wed more time and the requi­re­ments of Euro­pean law for ade­qua­cy would have allo­wed more free­dom in imple­men­ta­ti­on. The artic­le is free­ly available here.

A Sum­ma­ry of cri­ti­cisms of the draft of the FDPA has also writ­ten the aut­hor of this artic­le in a posi­ti­on paper which here as PDF retrie­va­ble is.

Aut­ho­ri­ty

Area

Topics

Rela­ted articles

Sub­scri­be