Take-Aways (AI)
  • The infor­ma­ti­on obli­ga­ti­ons under Art. 13 and 14 GDPR allow for a laye­red approach; in the case of tele­pho­ne cont­act, basic infor­ma­ti­on with refe­rence to fur­ther con­tent is sufficient.
  • Sim­ply refer­ring to a web­site is not enough; basic infor­ma­ti­on must be actively com­mu­ni­ca­ted, and the respon­si­ble par­ty is the com­pa­ny, not indi­vi­du­al employees.

The Sta­te Com­mis­sio­ner for Data Pro­tec­tion of the Sta­te of Lower Sax­o­ny has FAQ on the infor­ma­ti­on requi­re­ments published in accordance with Art. 13 and 14 DSGVO.

Nota­ble points include the following:

  • For the indi­ca­ti­on of the con­trol­ler, it seems to be neces­sa­ry to indi­ca­te not (only) the name of the com­pa­ny, but also the name and address of the mana­ging direc­tor. This is not cover­ed by the wor­ding of Art. 13 and 14 GDPR. The con­trol­ler is cle­ar­ly the com­pa­ny, not the indi­vi­du­al employee.
  • When spe­ci­fy­ing the pro­ce­s­sing pur­po­ses, it is suf­fi­ci­ent, for exam­p­le, to refer to “adver­ti­sing pur­po­ses”; the infor­ma­ti­on appar­ent­ly does not need to be more specific.
  • With regard to the sto­rage peri­od, refe­rence can be made to the “reten­ti­on peri­od for tax pur­po­ses”, for example.
  • In the case of the right of appeal, refe­rence should be made to the name of the spe­ci­fic com­pe­tent authority.
  • The per­son respon­si­ble can take a laye­red approach to pro­vi­ding infor­ma­ti­on. In the case of per­so­nal cont­act, it is suf­fi­ci­ent if the per­son respon­si­ble refers the data sub­ject to a noti­ce, for exam­p­le. At tele­pho­ne cont­acts it is suf­fi­ci­ent to point to the Respon­si­ble per­sons, the Editing pur­po­ses and exem­pla­ry to the Access right for ever­ything else can be refer­red to e.g. a Web­site be refer­red to. With a pure Appoint­ment on the pho­ne must initi­al­ly not be infor­med at all. When com­mu­ni­ca­ting by Let­ter an infor­ma­ti­on sheet can be enc­lo­sed. For com­mu­ni­ca­ti­on by E‑mail a “brief pre­sen­ta­ti­on of basic infor­ma­ti­on” is suf­fi­ci­ent; other­wi­se, refe­rence can be made to a website.
  • The mere refe­rence to a web­site, on the other hand, is not suf­fi­ci­ent.. The basic infor­ma­ti­on must be com­mu­ni­ca­ted (appar­ent­ly in the sen­se of a decla­ra­ti­on requi­ring receipt).
  • Also the exch­an­ge of Busi­ness cards is explained.
  • No infor­ma­ti­on obli­ga­ti­on exists vis-à-vis per­sons who­se data had been coll­ec­ted pri­or to the ent­ry into force of the GDPR. The same will app­ly under the new DPA.
  • It is enough to Infor­ma­ti­on in Ger­man even in the case of an iden­ti­fi­a­bly for­eign-lan­guage addres­see group; in this case, infor­ma­ti­on in a cor­re­spon­din­gly for­eign lan­guage is only recom­men­ded. Excep­ti­on: a web store that is aimed at per­sons in other Euro­pean countries.
  • Pho­to­graphs taken at par­ties, etc., must also include at least basic information.5