Take-Aways (AI)
  • Swit­ching from opt-out to opt-in for unad­dres­sed let­ter­box adver­ti­sing would signi­fi­cant­ly redu­ce paper waste and deli­ver only the desi­red advertising.
  • The Fede­ral Coun­cil sees the main cau­se in the pro­duc­tion of unad­dres­sed adver­ti­sing; a chan­ge of system is con­side­red que­stionable in rela­ti­on to the cost and effect.

Moti­on Christ (20.3113): Put an end to moun­ta­ins of paper waste. Opt-in instead of opt-out solu­ti­on for unad­dres­sed adver­ti­sing mailings.

Sub­mit­ted text

The Fede­ral Coun­cil is ins­truc­ted to adapt the legis­la­ti­on in such a way that, in the case of unad­dres­sed mail­box adver­ti­sing from the cur­rent opt-out system to a Opt-In System is chan­ged. Adver­ti­sing shall only be recei­ved by tho­se who expli­ci­t­ly wish to do so. Other­wi­se, no unad­dres­sed adver­ti­sing mail will be deli­ver­ed, with the excep­ti­on of mai­lings on which the deli­very orga­nizati­ons have agreed with the con­su­mer pro­tec­tion orga­nizati­ons (in par­ti­cu­lar mai­lings from public aut­ho­ri­ties, offi­ci­al publi­ca­ti­on organs and mai­lings from poli­ti­cal parties).

Justi­fi­ca­ti­on

In Switz­er­land, the opt-in solu­ti­on for unad­dres­sed adver­ti­sing is to be intro­du­ced. With such a solu­ti­on, in the future unneces­sa­ry moun­ta­ins of paper waste avo­ided beco­me. Sus­taina­bi­li­ty beg­ins at the front door and thus in one’s own mail­box. Moreo­ver, it is a libe­ral approach to say when you want some­thing and not when you don’t want something.

In prin­ci­ple, unad­dres­sed adver­ti­sing mail is not deli­ver­ed if a “Stop adver­ti­sing” sticker is affi­xed to a mail­box. Howe­ver, the­re are some excep­ti­ons to this prin­ci­ple, which the deli­very orga­nizati­ons have agreed on with the con­su­mer pro­tec­tion orga­nizati­ons. The­se include, in par­ti­cu­lar, mai­lings from public aut­ho­ri­ties, offi­ci­al publi­ca­ti­ons and mai­lings from poli­ti­cal parties.

The fact is, howe­ver, that far too much unwan­ted adver­ti­sing ends up in the mail­box and then direct­ly in the trash, whe­ther becau­se no adhesi­ve was applied or becau­se it was ignored.

Rese­arch shows that the majo­ri­ty (53 per­cent) look at adver­ti­sing only par­ti­al­ly (28 per­cent) or not at all (25 per­cent). The­se moun­ta­ins of paper waste can be avo­ided with a rever­sal of the system.

In Amster­dam you won’t find “Stop adver­ti­sing” stickers on mail­bo­xes, but ones with “Plea­se adver­ti­se. The Dutch capi­tal has alre­a­dy sol­ved the pro­blem by requi­ring that mail­box adver­ti­se­ments be Opt-out chan­ged to an opt-in system has. Accor­ding to the city, this saves 6000 tons of waste per year.

State­ment of the Fede­ral Coun­cil of 13.5.2020

The moti­on pur­sues the goal of avo­i­ding the deli­very of unso­li­ci­ted adver­ti­sing mail. In the view of the Fede­ral Coun­cil, the pro­blem addres­sed lies pri­ma­ri­ly due to the pro­duc­tion of unad­dres­sed adver­ti­sing mail by the respec­ti­ve com­pa­nies and not to the pro­ce­s­sing of deli­very. The most effec­ti­ve way is for com­pa­nies to reco­gnize the value of a sus­tainable adver­ti­sing poli­cy and also pay more atten­ti­on to eco­lo­gi­cal aspects when mai­ling. Digi­tizati­on as well as the phy­si­cal dis­tri­bu­ti­on chan­nel offer com­pa­nies a wide ran­ge of oppor­tu­ni­ties to make adver­ti­sing more effec­ti­ve and thus redu­ce wastage.

The solu­ti­on pro­po­sed in the moti­on aims at a chan­ge in the system of the reci­pi­en­ts’ right to express their will. Today, the reci­pi­en­ts exer­cise their right to refu­se accep­tance by sub­mit­ting a “Stop adver­ti­sing sticker” on their mail­box. This is a simp­le and effec­ti­ve mea­su­re, in order to redu­ce unwan­ted adver­ti­sing mail. The­se or simi­lar stickers must be obser­ved by Swiss Post and pri­va­te deli­very orga­nizati­ons. For exam­p­le, the Swiss Dia­log Mar­ke­ting Asso­cia­ti­on (SDV), to which many pri­va­te deli­very orga­nizati­ons are affi­lia­ted, also sta­tes in a Code of Ethics sti­pu­la­tes that, as a mat­ter of prin­ci­ple, deli­very is to be made exclu­si­ve­ly to mail­bo­xes wit­hout a “Stop adver­ti­sing” sticker. Com­plaints against dis­re­gard of the stickers can be sub­mit­ted to the Swiss Fair Tra­ding Commission.

The cur­rent opt-out prin­ci­ple has been in place for seve­ral deca­des and is well known among the popu­la­ti­on. The num­ber of mail­bo­xes with stop adver­ti­sing stickers is high. The Bene­fit of a system chan­ge is que­stionable and out of all pro­por­ti­on to the effort invol­ved. In par­ti­cu­lar, it is not to be expec­ted that tho­se who today dis­re­gard the will of the reci­pi­ent would no lon­ger do so as a result of the new system.