Moti­on Mül­ler (26.3044): Accoun­ta­bi­li­ty for inter­nal com­pa­ny data flows and databases

Sub­mit­ted text

The Fede­ral Coun­cil is ins­truc­ted to sub­mit a bill to Par­lia­ment to amend the Swiss Code of Obli­ga­ti­ons (CO), which:

  1. Com­pa­nies that are sub­ject to an ordi­na­ry audit are obli­ged to dis­c­lo­se the fol­lo­wing in the manage­ment report Accoun­ta­bi­li­ty for their inter­nal data flows and their data­ba­ses to file.
  2. To this end, Artic­le 961c para. 2 CO is to be sup­ple­men­ted by a para­graph requi­ring the dis­clo­sure of the data flow and the company’s key data sets.

Justi­fi­ca­ti­on

Initi­al situa­ti­on and need for action
Today, data is a key eco­no­mic pro­duc­tion fac­tor. It is the basis for busi­ness decis­i­ons, inno­va­ti­on, increa­sed effi­ci­en­cy and new busi­ness models. Despi­te this importance many com­pa­nies do not have a syste­ma­tic over­view of their inter­nal data flows and their data­ba­ses.

This lack of trans­pa­ren­cy leads to increa­sed legal, orga­nizatio­nal and secu­ri­ty-rela­ted risks, par­ti­cu­lar­ly in the are­as of data pro­tec­tion, infor­ma­ti­on secu­ri­ty, com­pli­ance and cor­po­ra­te gover­nan­ce. At the same time, it makes it dif­fi­cult for inve­stors, super­vi­so­ry aut­ho­ri­ties and other stake­hol­ders to rea­li­sti­cal­ly assess the eco­no­mic situa­ti­on of a company.

The cur­rent Code of Obli­ga­ti­ons does not yet include a gene­ral obli­ga­ti­on to account for the hand­ling of data. This gap stands in con­trast to natio­nal and inter­na­tio­nal deve­lo­p­ments, which are incre­a­sing­ly focu­sing on trans­pa­ren­cy, accoun­ta­bi­li­ty and data governance.

2. inte­gra­ti­on into the exi­sting legal system
The hand­ling of data is curr­ent­ly regu­la­ted frag­men­ta­ri­ly in Swiss law, inclu­ding by data pro­tec­tion law, intellec­tu­al pro­per­ty law, com­pe­ti­ti­on law and sec­tor-spe­ci­fic decrees. Howe­ver, the­re is no over­ar­ching, com­pa­ny-spe­ci­fic trans­pa­ren­cy obligation.

With a sel­ec­ti­ve Addi­ti­on to Artic­le 961c CO this gap can be clo­sed wit­hout affec­ting exi­sting spe­cial laws. Dis­clo­sure is made in the Manage­ment report and thus sup­ple­ments exi­sting dis­clo­sures on risk assess­ment and the inter­nal con­trol system.

It makes sen­se to pro­vi­de a simp­le over­view in the sen­se of a Cock­pits across all data­ba­ses. It is based on data that is alre­a­dy available as part of the inter­nal con­trol system, risk manage­ment or, whe­re appli­ca­ble, spe­cial sta­tu­to­ry docu­men­ta­ti­on obli­ga­ti­ons. A This does not result in addi­tio­nal costs.

The pro­po­sed regu­la­ti­on streng­thens the Cor­po­ra­te Gover­nan­ce and increa­ses the matu­ri­ty of cor­po­ra­te manage­ment. It pro­mo­tes a more con­scious, secu­re and eco­no­mic­al­ly effi­ci­ent hand­ling of data.

At the same time, it increa­ses the Attrac­ti­ve­ness of the busi­ness loca­ti­on Switz­er­land. In addi­ti­on, the mea­su­re sup­ports the cross-bor­der move­ment of data and capi­tal and posi­ti­ons Switz­er­land as a relia­ble, com­pe­ti­ti­ve digi­tal and busi­ness location.

A tar­ge­ted amend­ment to the Code of Obli­ga­ti­ons can signi­fi­cant­ly impro­ve trans­pa­ren­cy in the hand­ling of data. The moti­on con­tri­bu­tes to streng­thening data gover­nan­ce, mini­mi­zing risk and secu­ring Switzerland’s long-term com­pe­ti­ti­ve­ness wit­hout crea­ting new par­al­lel regulations.