Take-Aways (AI)
  • Deve­lo­p­ment of a sove­reign AI assi­stant based on open source lan­guage models spe­ci­fi­cal­ly for coun­cil mem­bers, hosted on Swiss infrastructure.
  • Ensu­ring data pro­tec­tion and con­fi­den­tia­li­ty to pre­vent the leaka­ge of sen­si­ti­ve infor­ma­ti­on to for­eign platforms.
  • Avo­id­ance of exter­nal depen­den­ci­es and bias through a natio­nal­ly coor­di­na­ted solu­ti­on, ali­gned with demo­cra­tic values and par­lia­men­ta­ry needs.

Moti­on SPK‑N (25.3530): For a sove­reign, secu­re and con­text-sen­si­ti­ve AI assi­stant for mem­bers of the Council

Sub­mit­ted text

The Office of the Natio­nal Coun­cil is ins­truc­ted, to have an arti­fi­ci­al intel­li­gence assi­stant deve­lo­ped espe­ci­al­ly for the mem­bers of the Fede­ral Assem­bly. This tool is to be based on an open source lan­guage model that is tail­o­red to the needs of the legis­la­tu­re and lin­ked to the rele­vant fede­ral data­ba­ses. The AI assi­stant is to be hosted on a sove­reign Swiss infras­truc­tu­re in order to gua­ran­tee con­fi­den­tia­li­ty and ensu­re the inde­pen­dence of respon­ses from for­eign influences.

Mino­ri­ty

A mino­ri­ty of the com­mit­tee (Schny­der Mar­kus, Addor, Golay Roger, Gra­ber Micha­el, Göt­te, Hurter Tho­mas, Knut­ti, Tue­na, Zuber­büh­ler) reque­sted that the moti­on be rejected.

Justi­fi­ca­ti­on

Arti­fi­ci­al intel­li­gence (AI) is making rapid pro­gress and is beco­ming a key fac­tor in many are­as – inclu­ding par­lia­men­ta­ry work. indis­pensable tool. Seve­ral Coun­cil mem­bers alre­a­dy use AI chat­bots such as ChatGPT or Clau­deto ana­ly­ze texts, prepa­re pro­po­sals or sum­ma­ri­ze docu­ments. Alt­hough the­se tools are useful, the fol­lo­wing three main chal­lenges ari­se when using them:

  1. The­re is a risk that sen­si­ti­ve infor­ma­ti­on will be dis­c­lo­sed to secu­re frame­work of the fede­ral govern­ment and beco­me public.
  2. The­re is a risk that the ans­wers from tools with a “Bias”, a prio­ri­tizati­on or a logic that runs coun­ter to Swiss interests.
  3. The­re is a Struc­tu­ral depen­den­cy of tech­no­lo­gies deve­lo­ped out­side the Swiss insti­tu­tio­nal and legal framework.

To meet the­se chal­lenges, Switz­er­land must offer a sove­reign and effi­ci­ent alter­na­ti­ve: a AI assi­stant spe­ci­al­ly desi­gned for the Coun­cil mem­berswhich is hosted on ser­vers in Switz­er­land, is based on Swiss demo­cra­tic values and is lin­ked to the docu­men­ta­ti­on resour­ces rele­vant to the man­da­te of the Coun­cil mem­bers. This assi­stant could pro­vi­de useful and tar­ge­ted func­tions, such as sum­ma­ri­zing draft legis­la­ti­on, hel­ping to draft texts, com­pa­ring simi­lar texts or initia­ti­ves, and sup­port­ing issue monitoring.

Such a tool could not only increa­se the effi­ci­en­cy of par­lia­men­ta­ry work, but also ensu­re the digi­tal sove­reig­n­ty of par­lia­ment by pre­ven­ting the exch­an­ge of sen­si­ti­ve data via for­eign plat­forms. For the legis­la­tu­re, it is a fun­da­men­tal que­sti­on of secu­ri­ty and independence.

The Par­lia­men­ta­ry Libra­ry has alre­a­dy laun­ched a cor­re­spon­ding pilot pro­ject and seve­ral fede­ral units are also test­ing AI solu­ti­ons that are tail­o­red to their needs. It is impe­ra­ti­ve that the­se efforts are coor­di­na­ted. It is time for the country’s hig­hest demo­cra­tic aut­ho­ri­ty to also have a tool that lives up to its respon­si­bi­li­ties and not have to make do with Gov­Chat, which is inten­ded for the administration.

Count­ries such as Ita­ly have alre­a­dy taken this path. Switz­er­land must no lon­ger be depen­dent on exter­nal actors to exer­cise its legis­la­ti­ve power.