Take-Aways (AI)
  • The moti­on calls for can­to­nal tax data to be anony­mi­zed befo­re it is trans­fer­red to the fede­ral govern­ment in order to pro­tect per­so­nal rights and tax confidentiality.
  • Instead, the Fede­ral Coun­cil wants to deve­lop a for­mal legal basis and empha­si­zes data pro­tec­tion and data secu­ri­ty, which is why the amend­ment to the ordi­nan­ce was withdrawn.

Moti­on WAK NR (25.3024): No dis­clo­sure of tax data wit­hout anonymization

Sub­mit­ted text

The Fede­ral Coun­cil is ins­truc­ted to amend its draft of the Fede­ral Sta­tis­tics Ordi­nan­ce to ensu­re that tax data coll­ec­ted for sta­tis­ti­cal pur­po­ses is anony­mi­zed befo­re it is trans­mit­ted to the fede­ral government.

Mino­ri­ty

A mino­ri­ty (Bert­schy, Amoos, Andrey, Ben­da­han, Gro­ssen Jürg, Mass­hardt, Roth David, Ryser, Wer­muth) reque­sted that the moti­on be rejected.

Justi­fi­ca­ti­on

The wor­ding of this moti­on cor­re­sponds to that of the moti­on sub­mit­ted by Coun­cil­lor of Sta­tes Fabio Regaz­zi on May 30, 2024 24.3507.

In the draft for a Ordi­nan­ce on Fede­ral Sta­tis­tics, which was sub­mit­ted for con­sul­ta­ti­on in Decem­ber 2023, the Fede­ral Coun­cil plans to obli­ge the can­tons to pro­vi­de the Con­fe­de­ra­ti­on with Tax data of natu­ral per­sons in non-anony­mi­zed form to transmit.

The Fede­ral Council’s expl­ana­to­ry report sta­tes on page 44 that the ana­ly­sis applies to both natu­ral per­sons and legal enti­ties. Alt­hough both are­as are of gre­at inte­rest for the sta­tis­tics, it was deci­ded to con­cen­tra­te on the data of natu­ral per­sons first. In other words: In a second step, tax data from com­pa­nies must also be pas­sed on to the fede­ral govern­ment for sta­tis­ti­cal pur­po­ses in a non-anony­mi­zed form.

The data to be trans­mit­ted in non-anony­mi­zed form inclu­des various infor­ma­ti­on on the pri­va­te, pro­fes­sio­nal and eco­no­mic situa­ti­on. The draft sti­pu­la­tes that infor­ma­ti­on on inco­me, assets, deduc­tions for medi­cal expen­ses or poli­ti­cal par­ties, pro­fes­sio­nal expen­ses, church taxes, etc. must be trans­mit­ted. This is the­r­e­fo­re per­so­nal data wort­hy of protection.

The non-anony­mi­zed trans­mis­si­on of tax data to the fede­ral govern­ment would be con­tra­ry to the Rela­ti­on­ship of trust bet­ween tax­payers and the can­to­nal tax admi­ni­stra­ti­ons damage.

The con­so­li­da­ti­on of all tax data in non-anony­mi­zed form would ent­ail a con­sidera­ble risk, as the vul­nerabi­li­ty to cyber attacks, which in turn would result in mas­si­ve data out­flows, would increase.

In the opi­ni­on of the Fede­ral Coun­cil, the public inte­rest in the pro­duc­tion of sta­tis­tics should be given grea­ter weight than tax con­fi­den­tia­li­ty. Accor­ding to a legal opi­ni­on com­mis­sio­ned by the Direc­tion géné­ra­le de la fis­ca­li­té of the can­ton of Vaud from for­mer fede­ral judge Pro­fes­sor Peter Locher, tax sec­re­cy is to be given grea­ter weight than requi­re­ments in the area of sta­tis­tics. In other words, the lif­ting of tax sec­re­cy requi­res a for­mal legal basis.

State­ment of the Fede­ral Coun­cil of 2.4.2025

The Fede­ral Coun­cil reco­gnizes the repea­ted­ly expres­sed con­cern for a For­mal legal basis on the con­di­ti­ons under which the Con­fe­de­ra­ti­on can coll­ect the can­to­nal tax data requi­red for sta­tis­ti­cal pro­jects. It is the­r­e­fo­re pre­pared to deve­lop a cor­re­spon­ding pro­vi­si­on. Con­se­quent­ly, the Fede­ral Coun­cil also requests that the simul­ta­neous­ly sub­mit­ted Moti­on 25.3025 of the Com­mit­tee for Eco­no­mic Affairs and Taxa­ti­on of the Natio­nal Coun­cil “Trans­mis­si­on of tax data by the can­tons to the Con­fe­de­ra­ti­on for sta­tis­ti­cal pur­po­ses. For a for­mal legal basis”. The Fede­ral Coun­cil will pay par­ti­cu­lar atten­ti­on to data pro­tec­tion and data secu­ri­ty (data rece­ipt, pseud­ony­mizati­on, data pro­ce­s­sing, data sto­rage, etc.) when ful­fil­ling the motion.

The Fede­ral Council’s decis­i­on not to include the coll­ec­tion of tax data in the revi­sed Sta­tis­ti­cal Data Coll­ec­tion Ordi­nan­ce (SR 431.012.1) ren­ders the request in this moti­on mate­ri­al­ly irrelevant.