26.09.2024

Moti­on Würth (24.4045): The con­sti­tu­ti­on needs a digi­tizati­on article

Sub­mit­ted text

The Fede­ral Coun­cil is ins­truc­ted to sub­mit a dis­patch and draft bill to Par­lia­ment for a Digi­tizati­on artic­le in the Fede­ral Con­sti­tu­ti­on to sub­mit. It is deve­lo­ping this draft with the invol­vement of the can­tons. The basic prin­ci­ples of the “Digi­tal Admi­ni­stra­ti­on Switz­er­land (DSA)”, which is sup­port­ed by the Con­fe­de­ra­ti­on and the can­tons, should be obser­ved. In this sen­se, a regu­la­to­ry approach could be as follows:

Art. XX Digi­tal govern­ment services

1 Within the scope of their respon­si­bi­li­ties, the Con­fe­de­ra­ti­on and the can­tons shall ensu­re ade­qua­te Sup­p­ly with high-qua­li­ty digi­tal govern­ment services.

2 The Con­fe­de­ra­ti­on and the can­tons shall coor­di­na­te the per­for­mance of their tasks. To this end, the law crea­tes a joint bodywhich is made up of equal num­bers of fede­ral and can­to­nal representatives.

3 The Con­fe­de­ra­ti­on may imple­ment tech­ni­cal, orga­nizatio­nal and pro­ce­du­ral Bin­ding stan­dards for digi­tal govern­ment ser­vices decla­re. Stan­dards that rela­te to can­to­nal respon­si­bi­li­ties requi­re the appr­oval of the joint body in order to be bin­ding. The can­tons are respon­si­ble for coor­di­na­ting the opi­ni­ons of the can­to­nal repre­sen­ta­ti­ves in the joint body.

4 The Con­fe­de­ra­ti­on may pro­vi­de digi­tal govern­ment ser­vices, inclu­ding the neces­sa­ry infor­ma­ti­on and com­mu­ni­ca­ti­on tech­no­lo­gy resour­ces. The law shall regu­la­te imple­men­ta­ti­on and financing.

Justi­fi­ca­ti­on

The digi­tal trans­for­ma­ti­on in the public sec­tor is also pro­gres­sing in Switz­er­land. Howe­ver, it is obvious that the con­sti­tu­tio­nal pro­blems in the various are­as of respon­si­bi­li­ty are piling up due to the lack of a digi­tizati­on artic­le. Cla­ri­fi­ca­ti­on is nee­ded. This should also take place as part of the postu­la­te 23.3050 that has been trans­fer­red. Howe­ver, cur­rent pro­po­sals in Par­lia­ment now show that grea­ter urgen­cy is required.

The digi­tal trans­for­ma­ti­on is chal­len­ging the fede­ral govern­ment, can­tons and muni­ci­pa­li­ties in equal mea­su­re. The asso­cia­ted chal­lenges can­not be maste­red by any level of govern­ment alo­ne. The main obs­ta­cles to the digi­tal trans­for­ma­ti­on of the admi­ni­stra­ti­on in Switz­er­land are the lack of basic ser­vices and infras­truc­tures as well as the lack of tech­ni­cal, orga­nizatio­nal and legal stan­dards that would enable inter­ope­ra­bi­li­ty and mul­ti­ple use of exi­sting solutions.

The exi­sting system of com­pe­ten­ci­es no lon­ger meets the­se requi­re­ments. A new approach is nee­dedso that bin­ding spe­ci­fi­ca­ti­ons on stan­dards, ser­vice pro­vi­si­on or the use of tech­ni­cal ser­vices can be issued.

The important role of the can­tons and muni­ci­pa­li­ties in the admi­ni­stra­ti­ve orga­nizati­on and pro­ce­du­re must be taken into account. The­re is a need for appro­pria­te par­ti­ci­pa­ti­on that effec­tively takes account of Switzerland’s fede­ral sta­te struc­tu­re. It the­r­e­fo­re seems appro­pria­te to con­sist­ent­ly pur­sue the path taken with the estab­lish­ment of “Digi­tal Admi­ni­stra­ti­on Switz­er­land”.