Take-Aways (AI)
  • Can­tons should once again be able to publish civil sta­tus data (births, deaths, mar­ria­ges, part­ner­ships) with the con­sent of the par­ties concerned.
  • The repeal of Artic­le 57 ZStV 2017 remo­ved the legal basis; the moti­on demands its resto­ra­ti­on for legal clarification.
  • The Fede­ral Coun­cil points out that can­tons can alre­a­dy publish life events under can­to­nal law, for exam­p­le from the resi­dents’ register.

Moti­on Zuber­büh­ler (17.3662): The pos­si­bi­li­ty of the can­tons to publish civil sta­tus cases should be given again

Sub­mit­ted text

The Fede­ral Coun­cil is ins­truc­ted to crea­te a legal basis so that can­tons once again have the opti­on, Publish civil sta­tus cases, such as births, deaths, mar­ria­ges, and part­ner­ship regi­stra­ti­ons.

Justi­fi­ca­ti­on

On Octo­ber 26, 2016, the Fede­ral Coun­cil adopted a revi­si­on of the Fede­ral Ordi­nan­ce on Civil Sta­tus (ZStV) and dele­ted Artic­le 57 as part of the revi­si­on. Among other things, this revi­si­on abo­lishes the pos­si­bi­li­ty for the can­tons to publish civil sta­tus cases. Civil sta­tus cases are births, deaths, mar­ria­ges and regi­stra­ti­ons of part­ner­ships. The Fede­ral Coun­cil justi­fi­es this by sta­ting that the Publi­ca­ti­on of this data would rai­se data pro­tec­tion issues and would no lon­ger cor­re­spond to an over­ri­ding inte­rest.. The revi­si­on came into force on July 1, 2017. With the repeal of the cor­re­spon­ding pro­vi­si­on in the Fede­ral Civil Sta­tus Ordi­nan­ce, the legal basis for the publi­ca­ti­on of civil sta­tus cases cea­ses to exist.
In com­mu­ni­ties (espe­ci­al­ly in small com­mu­ni­ties), howe­ver, it is important for resi­dents to be infor­med about life in the vil­la­ge or com­mu­ni­ty. It is not wit­hout rea­son that birth, mar­ria­ge and death announce­ments are among the best-read sec­tions of news­pa­pers and news­let­ters. The argu­ment that publi­ca­ti­on does not cor­re­spond to an over­ri­ding inte­rest must the­r­e­fo­re be contradicted.
Espe­ci­al­ly nowa­days, when the world is beco­ming more and more anony­mous, it should be pos­si­ble to rejoice over new­co­mers in the cir­cle of acquain­tances or over a given word of yes or, for exam­p­le, to take part when someone has ended his earth­ly path.
In many can­tons, civil sta­tus cases are only published upon request and with the con­sent of all par­ties con­cer­ned. This solu­ti­on has pro­ven its­elf and has not led to any pro­blems. The pos­si­bi­li­ty for the can­tons to publish civil sta­tus cases with the con­sent of all tho­se con­cer­ned should the­r­e­fo­re con­ti­n­ue to exist. The repeal of Artic­le 57 of the Civil Sta­tus Ordi­nan­ce is to be cor­rec­ted with this motion.

State­ment of the Fede­ral Coun­cil of 22.11.2017

Irre­spec­ti­ve of the repeal of Artic­le 57 CstV, the can­tons are free to publish life events of their citi­zens on the basis of can­to­nal law, for exam­p­le from the regi­ster of resi­dents. This is expli­ci­t­ly sta­ted in the expl­ana­to­ry report on the repeal of Artic­le 57 of the CStV. Thus, the can­tons alre­a­dy have the pos­si­bi­li­ty to enact publi­ca­ti­on rules that meet their needs, as requi­red by the moti­on. Various can­tons and muni­ci­pa­li­ties make use of this, for exam­p­le in buri­al regu­la­ti­ons for the publi­ca­ti­on of deaths.