Postu­la­te Fivaz (21.4498): Per­so­na­li­zed adver­ti­sing. Pro­hi­bi­ti­on of adver­ti­sing based on data coll­ec­tion and profiling.

Postu­la­te Fivaz (21.4498): Per­so­na­li­zed adver­ti­sing. Pro­hi­bi­ti­on of adver­ti­sing based on data coll­ec­tion and profiling.

Sub­mit­ted text

The Fede­ral Coun­cil is cal­led upon to assess the impact of tar­ge­ted adver­ti­sing, based on the acqui­si­ti­on of data (per­so­na­li­zed adver­ti­sing), and to pro­po­se in a report an amend­ment to the law in order to pre­vent the use of such adver­ti­sing to pro­hi­bit or hea­vi­ly regulate.

Justi­fi­ca­ti­on

The domi­nant busi­ness model of the big digi­ta­lizati­on com­pa­nies, espe­ci­al­ly Goog­le and Face­book, is based on obtai­ning per­so­nal data, pro­fil­ing and sel­ling such infor­ma­ti­on in order to tar­get advertising.

Fol­lo­wing the mot­to “If it’s free, you’­re the pro­duct,” the­se com­pa­nies fight for our atten­ti­on and sell it to the hig­hest bidder: The time we spend on Face­book is not spent on Goog­le, and even less on other media.

Com­pe­ti­ti­on in this area is harmful in many ways. It is lea­ding com­pa­nies to deve­lop algo­rith­ms that can extre­me opi­ni­ons and mis­lea­ding infor­ma­ti­on pro­mo­te and fix the tar­get groups in their thin­king. The­se algo­rith­ms repre­sent a Risk for health and for demo­cra­cy and lead to more Dis­cri­mi­na­ti­on based on race, gen­der, etc. In return, the tech giants very hea­vi­ly fund web­sites that spread mis­lea­ding infor­ma­ti­on or ser­ve vio­lent groups by pla­cing advertisements.

The pre­vious solu­ti­ons of social net­work pro­vi­ders do not work (so-cal­led key­word blacklists).

This postu­la­te calls on the Fede­ral Coun­cil to stu­dy the effects of tar­ge­ted adver­ti­sing based on data coll­ec­tion and to pro­po­se in a report an amend­ment to the law to ban or stron­gly regu­la­te the use of such advertising.

State­ment of the Fede­ral Coun­cil from 23.02.2022

At OFCOM report of Novem­ber 17, 2021 “Inter­me­dia­ries and com­mu­ni­ca­ti­on plat­forms, impact on public com­mu­ni­ca­ti­on and approa­ches to gover­nan­ce”. the pro­blems rai­sed in the postu­la­te have alre­a­dy been dis­cus­sed, par­ti­cu­lar­ly with regard to the use of algo­rith­ms and their lack of trans­pa­ren­cy, and the impact of tar­ge­ted adver­ti­sing on dis­in­for­ma­ti­on and hate speech (https://www.bakom.admin.ch/bakom/de/home/digital-und-internet/digitale-kommunikation/kommunikationsplattformen.html). Various stu­dies com­mis­sio­ned by OFCOM con­clude that the popu­la­ti­on is entit­led to effec­ti­ve pro­tec­tion against ille­gal hate speech and dis­in­for­ma­ti­on, and that the Users’ rights bet­ter pro­tec­ted vis-à-vis inter­me­dia­ries would have to be made. OFCOM’s report con­clu­des that a wide dis­cus­sion on the que­sti­on of the social inte­gra­ti­on and gover­nan­ce of inter­me­dia­ries is neces­sa­ry in Switz­er­land, but also espe­ci­al­ly in the inter­na­tio­nal con­text. The Fede­ral Coun­cil has ins­truc­ted DETEC (OFCOM) to give it By the end of 2022, a pro­no­unce­ment paper set­ting out whe­ther and, if so, how com­mu­ni­ca­ti­ons plat­forms should be regulated.

It should also be men­tio­ned that the new Fede­ral Data Pro­tec­tion Act of Sep­tem­ber 25, 2020 (BBl 2020 7639) impro­ves trans­pa­ren­cy in the acqui­si­ti­on of per­so­nal data and streng­thens the rights of pri­va­te individuals.

For the­se rea­sons, the Fede­ral Coun­cil is of the opi­ni­on that a new report on this issue would not pro­vi­de any new insights and that the postu­la­te has alre­a­dy been ful­fil­led, at least in part.

Aut­ho­ri­ty

Area

Topics

Rela­ted articles

Sub­scri­be