Take-Aways (AI)
  • Fede­ral Coun­cil is not curr­ent­ly exami­ning a report on the postu­la­te; mea­su­res alre­a­dy taken are con­side­red sufficient.
  • Revi­sed Data Pro­tec­tion Act requi­res for­eign repre­sen­ta­ti­on when pro­ce­s­sing per­so­nal data in Switz­er­land sin­ce 1.9.2023
  • DETEC draws up con­sul­ta­ti­on draft on the regu­la­ti­on of com­mu­ni­ca­ti­on plat­forms and search engi­nes; obli­ga­ti­on to coope­ra­te was not included.
  • Exi­sting iden­ti­fi­ca­ti­on and coope­ra­ti­on obli­ga­ti­ons alre­a­dy exist in accordance with the BÜPF and asso­cia­ted imple­men­ting decrees.

Häs­sig postu­la­te (25.3379): Iden­ti­fi­ca­ti­on of cri­mi­nals on digi­tal platforms

Sub­mit­ted text

The Fede­ral Coun­cil is ins­truc­ted to exami­ne how the ope­ra­tors of lar­ge online plat­forms can be obli­ged to coope­ra­te imme­dia­te­ly and ful­ly with the aut­ho­ri­ties in the event of poten­ti­al­ly unlawful acts by their users and in any case to enable iden­ti­fi­ca­ti­on of the users con­cer­ned. The tested solu­ti­ons should take into account the prin­ci­ples of “pri­va­cy by design”, data eco­no­my and decen­tra­li­zed data sto­rage and ensu­re that no iden­ti­ty data is stored direct­ly on platforms.

Justi­fi­ca­ti­on

The exten­si­ve anony­mi­ty on digi­tal plat­forms, par­ti­cu­lar­ly on social media, encou­ra­ges the spread of ille­gal con­tent (espe­ci­al­ly hate speech, dis­cri­mi­na­ti­on and inci­te­ment to vio­lence). The cur­rent con­trols on digi­tal plat­forms by human and algo­rith­mic mode­ra­tors are incon­si­stent and usual­ly insuf­fi­ci­ent to take effec­ti­ve action against ille­gal con­tent. Per­pe­tra­tors can hide behind anony­mous pro­files and thus avo­id legal consequences.

In order to coun­ter this abu­se, ope­ra­tors of digi­tal plat­forms would have to be obli­ged to coope­ra­te with the rele­vant aut­ho­ri­ties and legal repre­sen­ta­ti­ves in justi­cia­ble cases and make it pos­si­ble to iden­ti­fy suspec­ted perpetrators.

State­ment of the Fede­ral Coun­cil of 14.5.2025

Pro­tec­ting the public from ille­gal con­tent is a key con­cern for the Fede­ral Coun­cil. In various reports, it has addres­sed, among other things, the dif­fi­cul­ties of law enforce­ment in con­nec­tion with anony­mous users of online plat­forms (most recent­ly in the Fede­ral Council’s report in ful­fill­ment of the Postu­la­te 21.3450 “Hate speech. Are the­re legal loopho­les?”). An important step towards impro­ving the situa­ti­on has been taken with the revi­sed Data Pro­tec­tion Act. Sin­ce Sep­tem­ber 1, 2023, pri­va­te data pro­ces­sors based abroad must desi­gna­te a repre­sen­ta­ti­ve in Switz­er­land if they pro­cess per­so­nal data of per­sons in Switz­er­land under cer­tain con­di­ti­ons (Art. 14 f. FADP).

The Fede­ral Coun­cil also ins­truc­ted DETEC on April 5, 2023 Assi­gnedto draw up a con­sul­ta­ti­on draft on the regu­la­ti­on of com­mu­ni­ca­ti­on plat­forms and search engi­nes and set out the main thrusts. The Fede­ral Council’s man­da­te of April 5, 2023 did not include an obli­ga­ti­on for ope­ra­tors of lar­ge online plat­forms to coope­ra­te with the aut­ho­ri­ties in the event of poten­ti­al­ly unlawful acts by users. The con­sul­ta­ti­on draft was draf­ted. The Fede­ral Coun­cil has alre­a­dy dis­cus­sed it seve­ral times and will make a decis­i­on at a later date.

Fur­ther­mo­re, online plat­forms that pro­vi­de com­mu­ni­ca­ti­on ser­vices for third par­ties and who­se ser­vices run via Switz­er­land alre­a­dy have cer­tain iden­ti­fi­ca­ti­on or coope­ra­ti­on obli­ga­ti­ons with Swiss aut­ho­ri­ties based on the Fede­ral Act on the Sur­veil­lan­ce of Postal and Tele­com­mu­ni­ca­ti­ons Traf­fic (SPTA). Sub­scri­ber and user iden­ti­fi­ca­ti­on obli­ga­ti­ons are also the sub­ject of the Con­sul­ta­ti­on on two imple­men­ting decrees on the Sur­veil­lan­ce of Postal and Tele­com­mu­ni­ca­ti­ons Traf­fic (VÜPF, VD-ÜPF).

The Fede­ral Coun­cil the­r­e­fo­re does not curr­ent­ly con­sider a report on the postu­la­te to be appropriate.