Take-Aways (AI)
  • Demand for rela­xa­ti­on of data pro­tec­tion legis­la­ti­on and limi­ta­ti­on of the FDPIC’s inter­ven­ti­on in pri­va­te com­pa­nies in order to redu­ce bureau­cra­cy and costs.
  • the­sis that strict data pro­tec­tion regu­la­ti­ons inhi­bit inno­va­ti­on, rest­rict free­dom of use and jeo­par­di­ze Switzerland’s eco­no­mic competitiveness.

Postu­la­te Nan­ter­mod (24.405): Stop­ping the tyran­ny of data protection

Sub­mit­ted text

The Fede­ral Coun­cil is ins­truc­ted, as part of a legal ana­ly­sis, to take effec­ti­ve mea­su­res for Sim­pli­fi­ca­ti­ons in data pro­tec­tion legis­la­ti­on to be sub­mit­ted. The data pro­tec­tion pro­vi­si­ons are to be rela­xed, exten­si­ve inter­pre­ta­ti­ons of the legis­la­ti­on pre­ven­ted and the inter­ven­ti­ons of the Fede­ral Data Pro­tec­tion and Infor­ma­ti­on Com­mis­sio­ner (FDPIC) with pri­va­te indi­vi­du­als limited.

Justi­fi­ca­ti­on

With the deve­lo­p­ment of infor­ma­ti­on tech­no­lo­gy, data pro­tec­tion has beco­me a major con­cern. The topic has beco­me such a focus that it has beco­me a real busi­ness. Count­less advi­sors have made data pro­tec­tion their profession.

It is no lon­ger about making ever­y­day life easier for citi­zens and pro­tec­ting their pri­va­cy. On the con­tra­ry, the high data pro­tec­tion requi­re­ments unneces­s­a­ri­ly com­pli­ca­te inter­per­so­nal rela­ti­on­ships, pre­vent and com­pli­ca­te access to very prac­ti­cal tools, increa­se costs for com­pa­nies and crea­te a hel­lish bureau­cra­cy.

While the aut­ho­ri­ties set up spe­ci­fi­cal­ly for data pro­tec­tion pur­po­ses num­e­rous gui­de­lines inspi­reThe lat­ter have the justi­fi­ed fee­ling that they are being patro­ni­zed and can no lon­ger enjoy the bene­fits of new tech­no­lo­gies unhindered.

Examp­les of this are the num­e­rous bans on using very prac­ti­cal appli­ca­ti­ons such as Whats­app, the some­ti­mes absurd requi­re­ments for com­pa­nies to obtain data that is not con­fi­den­ti­al at all, or the eter­nal coo­kies that make sur­fing the inter­net so exhaus­ting. Apple recent­ly announ­ced that it would no lon­ger offer some of its ser­vices, inclu­ding the most prac­ti­cal ones, to users in Euro­pe due to unneces­sa­ry data pro­tec­tion legis­la­ti­on. In Switz­er­land, the FDPIC even inter­ven­ed with the Digi­tec plat­formThe plat­form does not have the right to demand the crea­ti­on of a cus­to­mer account for orders. This inter­ven­ti­on by the FDPIC in the pri­va­te sec­tor has not­hing whatsoe­ver to do with data pro­tec­tion.

Fur­ther­mo­re, the new data pro­tec­tion regu­la­ti­ons men­tio­ned abo­ve are a clear obs­ta­cle to inno­va­ti­on at a time when Euro­pe and Switz­er­land must be careful not to lose touch eco­no­mic­al­ly. Last but not least, against the back­drop of the cur­rent spen­ding cuts, one might ask whe­ther con­sidera­ble savings could not be made in the area of data protection.