Take-Aways (AI)
  • Spa­nish data pro­tec­tion aut­ho­ri­ty impo­sed a fine of EUR 2,000 on a lawy­er for unpro­tec­ted dis­clo­sure of tenant data.
  • Vio­la­ti­on of Art. 32 para. 1 GDPR: lack of tech­ni­cal and orga­nizatio­nal mea­su­res to pro­tect per­so­nal data.
  • Breach was negli­gent and invol­ved sen­si­ti­ve data, inclu­ding the name of a minor; redac­tion would have been required.

The Spa­nish data pro­tec­tion super­vi­so­ry aut­ho­ri­ty, the,has impo­sed a fine of EUR 2 000 on a lawy­er (Decis­i­on in the ori­gi­nal in Spa­nish; Ger­man ver­si­on via DeepL). The lawy­er had sum­mo­ned tenants of an apart­ment buil­ding in the cour­se of pro­ce­e­dings. In doing so, he used docu­ments on the back of which per­so­nal data of other tenants rele­vant to the pro­ce­e­dings could be seen, but also the name of a minor.

The AEPD con­side­red this to be a vio­la­ti­on of Artic­le 32 (1) of the GDPR becau­se the con­trol­ler had not taken appro­pria­te tech­ni­cal and orga­nizatio­nal mea­su­res within the mea­ning of Artic­le 32 (1) of the GDPR. Appar­ent­ly, the lawy­er should have blacked out the data of the third par­ty tenants. This breach was negli­gent and affec­ted sen­si­ti­ve data.