In the present case, the Federal Supreme Court has established criteria for distinguishing between undercover investigations requiring authorization within the meaning of StPO 285a and undercover investigations not requiring authorization pursuant to StPO 298.

David Vasella

20 October 2016

Deutsch

Authority

BGer

Area

Privacy

Topics

Criminal proceedings

Laws

FDPA

GDPR

DPO

DSV in English

draft FDPO

nDSG EN

nDSG with message

FDPO

Privacy

Implementation of the revised DPA

Privacy FAQ

Links

latest articles

BVGer (A‑1353/2022): concluded customs criminal proceedings; no access to interrogation protocol of a third party; DSG 8 f. and 19

ECJ C‑634/21 – Applications GA: Credit score (of SCHUFA) as an automated decision

National Council: Mandatory reporting of cyber attacks supported

EDSA: Coordinated Enforcement Framework – Focus on DPOs

Postulate Die Mitte Group, Die Mitte, EVP.(23.3050): Binding standards for Switzerland’s digital administrative landscape. Is there a need for a digitization article in the Federal Constitution?

EU Commission publishes Q&A on publishing active users under Digital Services Act

Zurich Privacy Drinks: first edition on March 21, 2023

EDPB: final version of the guidelines on disclosure in third countries

Council of Europe: First Draft of the AI Convention

Federal Office of Justice publishes FAQ on data protection

common search words

Topics

swissblawg: 6B_1293/2015: Distinction between undercover investigations requiring authorization and undercover investigations not requiring authorization (amtl. Publ.)

BVGer (A‑1353/2022): concluded customs criminal proceedings; no access to interrogation protocol of a third party; DSG 8 f. and 19

OECD: Declaration on the conditions and limits of “lawful access” by member states

BVGer (A‑481/2022): Entry in the criminal register: threat of punishment decisive, not actual punishment; revision of the criminal register law

Interpellation Marti (22.3993): Legal basis for automated facial recognition in criminal proceedings

Laws

Pri­va­cy

latest artic­les

com­mon search words

Topics

swiss­blawg: 6B_1293/2015: Distinc­tion bet­ween under­co­ver inve­sti­ga­ti­ons requi­ring aut­ho­rizati­on and under­co­ver inve­sti­ga­ti­ons not requi­ring aut­ho­rizati­on (amtl. Publ.)

Privacy

latest articles

common search words

swissblawg: 6B_1293/2015: Distinction between undercover investigations requiring authorization and undercover investigations not requiring authorization (amtl. Publ.)