Take-Aways (AI)
  • RISAA extends FISA for two years, ensu­ring con­tin­ued aut­ho­ri­ty for intel­li­gence gathering.
  • Sec. 25 con­sider­a­b­ly expands the legal defi­ni­ti­on of the Elec­tro­nic Com­mu­ni­ca­ti­on Ser­vice Pro­vi­der (ECSP).
  • ECSP now poten­ti­al­ly covers any orga­nizati­on with access to devices for the trans­mis­si­on or sto­rage of elec­tro­nic communications.
  • The exten­si­on is appar­ent­ly a respon­se to a FISC ruling and could even cover aty­pi­cal ser­vice pro­vi­ders such as clea­ning companies.

FISA, the For­eign Intel­li­gence Sur­veil­lan­ce Act, the cen­ter­pie­ce of US intel­li­gence gathe­ring, is only enac­ted for a limi­t­ed peri­od of time. The last exten­si­on was gran­ted on Decem­ber 22, 2023 until April 19, 2024. Hours after it expi­red, Pre­si­dent Biden signed ano­ther exten­si­on for a fur­ther two years in the form of the “Reforming Intel­li­gence and Secu­ring Ame­ri­ca Act” (RISAA).

The RISAA not only extends the vali­di­ty of FISA, but also intro­du­ces a num­ber of chan­ges to its con­tent. Among other things, Sec. 25 of RISAA amends the legal defi­ni­ti­on of an Elec­tro­nic Com­mu­ni­ca­ti­on Ser­vice Pro­vi­der (ECSP) has been expan­ded. The Rele­vant pro­vi­si­on reads new (chan­ges in bold):

(4) Elec­tro­nic com­mu­ni­ca­ti­on ser­vice pro­vi­der ‑The term ‘elec­tro­nic com­mu­ni­ca­ti­on ser­vice pro­vi­der’ means-

(A) a tele­com­mu­ni­ca­ti­ons car­ri­er, as that term is defi­ned in sec­tion 3 of the Com­mu­ni­ca­ti­ons Act of 1934 (47 U.S.C. 153);

(B) a pro­vi­der of elec­tro­nic com­mu­ni­ca­ti­on ser­vice, as that term is defi­ned in sec­tion 2510 of tit­le 18United Sta­tes Code;

(C) a pro­vi­der of a remo­te com­pu­ting ser­vice, as that term is defi­ned in sec­tion 2711 of tit­le 18United Sta­tes Code;

(D) any other com­mu­ni­ca­ti­on ser­vice pro­vi­der who has access to wire or elec­tro­nic com­mu­ni­ca­ti­ons eit­her as such com­mu­ni­ca­ti­ons are trans­mit­ted or as such com­mu­ni­ca­ti­ons are stored; or

(E) any other ser­vice pro­vi­der who has access to equip­ment that is being or may be used to trans­mit or store wire or elec­tro­nic com­mu­ni­ca­ti­ons, but not inclu­ding any enti­ty that ser­ves pri­ma­ri­ly as-
(i) a public accom­mo­da­ti­on faci­li­ty, as that term is defi­ned in sec­tion 501(4);
(ii) a dwel­ling, as that term is defi­ned in sec­tion 802 of the Fair Housing Act (42 U.S.C. 3602);
(iii) a com­mu­ni­ty faci­li­ty, as that term is defi­ned in sec­tion 315 of the Defen­se Housing and Com­mu­ni­ty Faci­li­ties and Ser­vices Act of 1951 (42 U.S.C. 1592n); or
(iv) a food ser­vice estab­lish­ment, as that term is defi­ned in sec­tion 281 of the Agri­cul­tu­ral Mar­ke­ting Act of 1946 (7 U.S.C. 1638); or
(F) an offi­cer, employee, cus­to­di­an or agent of an enti­ty descri­bed in sub­pa­ra­graph (A), (B), (C), (D), or E.

In prin­ci­ple, any ser­vice pro­vi­der who has access to equip­ment that is or can be used for the trans­mis­si­on or sto­rage of elec­tro­nic com­mu­ni­ca­ti­ons is now also con­side­red an ECSP.

This is not an insi­gni­fi­cant expan­si­on. The term ECSP was alre­a­dy very broad­ly defi­ned – in prin­ci­ple, any com­pa­ny that pro­vi­ded com­mu­ni­ca­ti­on ser­vices for third par­ties was cover­ed. Howe­ver, any ser­vice pro­vi­der that has access to a ser­ver, a rou­ter, a PC or a tele­pho­ne would now poten­ti­al­ly be cover­ed – so pos­si­bly even a clea­ning com­pa­ny. It would appear that the US govern­ment is thus aiming for a Judgment of the FISC which had not clas­si­fi­ed a com­pa­ny – pre­su­ma­b­ly a data cen­ter – as an RCSP, as the online medi­um Just Secu­ri­ty has repor­ted.