Direc­ti­ve on coll­ec­ti­ve actions: Draft of the Com­mis­si­on and the Council

The Direc­ti­ve on repre­sen­ta­ti­ve actions for the pro­tec­tion of the coll­ec­ti­ve inte­rests of con­su­mers (“EU Asso­cia­ti­ons’ Com­plaints Direc­ti­ve”, “Coll­ec­ti­ve Redress Direc­ti­ve”) has gai­ned momen­tum. On June 22, 2020, the Par­lia­ment and the Coun­cil agreed on a revi­sed draft agreed, which is now to be con­side­red by the govern­ments of the mem­ber sta­tes. The draft is available here (PDF).

The aim of the direc­ti­ve is to ensu­re coll­ec­ti­ve inte­rests of con­su­mers in case of vio­la­ti­on of cer­tain rights. The mem­ber sta­tes must the­r­e­fo­re ensu­re at least a repre­sen­ta­ti­ve action that ensu­res both inte­rim legal pro­tec­tion and the enforce­ment of repa­ra­to­ry claims. The details are left to the Mem­ber Sta­tes. The direc­ti­ve does not regu­la­te que­sti­ons of juris­dic­tion, enforce­ment and appli­ca­ble law.

The are­as affec­ted are tho­se accor­ding to Annex I of the Direc­ti­ve – inclu­ding the GDPR (Reci­tals 6 and 6b and Annex I para. 53). The­re is the­r­e­fo­re not­hing to pre­vent also respon­si­ble par­ties or pro­ces­sors out­side the EEA may face a mass action in an EEA court in the event of a breach of the GDPR, which may need to be taken into account in risk assessments.

The back­ground to the direc­ti­ve is, on the one hand, “Die­sel­ga­te” and, on the other hand, the fact that the EU Com­mis­si­on recom­men­ded to the mem­ber sta­tes as ear­ly as 2013 to pro­vi­de for instru­ments for coll­ec­ti­ve redress, but sees this only insuf­fi­ci­ent­ly implemented:

  • A lar­ge pro­por­ti­on of mem­ber sta­tes do have such instru­ments, but often limi­t­ed to spe­ci­fic are­as of law, e.g. con­su­mer pro­tec­tion, com­pe­ti­ti­on law, labor law, finan­cial ser­vices or envi­ron­men­tal law.
  • In con­trast, only Bel­gi­um, Den­mark, Lithua­nia, the Net­her­lands, Por­tu­gal and the UK pro­vi­de for coll­ec­ti­ve actions for dama­ges in all areas.
  • In prac­ti­ce, coll­ec­ti­ve redress has beco­me important main­ly in cases of pas­sen­ger rights, finan­cial ser­vices and com­pe­ti­ti­on inf­rin­ge­ments (espe­ci­al­ly in the case of com­pen­sa­ti­on claims whe­re an inf­rin­ge­ment has been created).

Aut­ho­ri­ty

Area

Topics

Rela­ted articles

Sub­scri­be