The fact that the GDPR is per­haps not enti­re­ly prac­ti­cal in all respects is also a wide­spread opi­ni­on out­side of Switz­er­land. The GDPR has the­r­e­fo­re been added to the list of regu­la­to­ry sim­pli­fi­ca­ti­ons that the EU Com­mis­si­on curr­ent­ly being pur­sued to streng­then com­pe­ti­ti­ve­nessaccor­ding to a Com­mu­ni­ca­ti­on from EU Com­mis­sio­ner Micha­el McGrath. A broa­der packa­ge with sim­pli­fi­ca­ti­ons that include the GDPR is expected.

In this con­text, the EDSA and the EDPS have wro­te a let­ter to McGrath. They refer to a plan to extend the exemp­ti­ons from the obli­ga­ti­on to keep a pro­ce­s­sing register:

  • The cur­rent SME limit of 250 employees (Art. 30 para. 5 GDPR) is the­r­e­fo­re to be redu­ced to 500 employees be rai­sed, com­bi­ned with a tur­no­ver threshold;
  • This excep­ti­on should not be wai­ved, as is the case today, if pro­ce­s­sing ope­ra­ti­ons lead to risks, but only in the case of “high” risksand no lon­ger for every pro­ce­s­sing of par­ti­cu­lar­ly sen­si­ti­ve per­so­nal data.

EDSA and EDPS express cau­tious appr­oval of this proposal:

Based on the infor­ma­ti­on available, and sub­ject to a full ana­ly­sis of the spe­ci­fic pro­po­sal, the EDPB and EDPS can express preli­mi­na­ry sup­port to this tar­ge­ted sim­pli­fi­ca­ti­on initia­ti­ve, bea­ring in mind that this would not affect the obli­ga­ti­on of con­trol­lers and pro­ces­sors to com­ply with other GDPR obligations. […]

Switz­er­land should con­sider fol­lo­wing the­se sim­pli­fi­ca­ti­ons as they beco­me more con­cre­te. The FADP is based on the GDPR in many are­as – inclu­ding the pro­ce­s­sing direc­to­ry – with the aim of achie­ving com­pa­ra­ble pro­tec­tion. If the requi­re­ments of the GDPR fall, the DPA should react.