Con­sul­ta­ti­on on the moder­nizati­on of copy­right law

On 11.12.2015, the Fede­ral Coun­cil ope­ned the con­sul­ta­ti­on on the revi­si­on of copy­right law (see also Media release and swiss­blawg).

On the sub­ject of pira­cy, the Fede­ral Coun­cil comm­ents as follows:

More effi­ci­ent fight against piracy

The com­mit­tee set up by Fede­ral Pre­si­dent Simo­net­ta Som­ma­ru­ga AGUR12 agreed that tar­ge­ted mea­su­res should be taken against pira­cy. The bill takes up this con­cern. In the future, anti-pira­cy mea­su­res are to be taken whe­re they are most effi­ci­ent, name­ly by the pro­vi­ders. They can act quick­ly and in a tar­ge­ted man­ner. Swiss hosting pro­vi­ders are not to host pira­cy plat­forms and, in the event of copy­right inf­rin­ge­ments via their ser­vers, are to remo­ve the con­tent in que­sti­on quick­ly. Howe­ver, lar­ge, com­mer­cial pira­te sites are often hosted by hosting pro­vi­ders who­se head­quar­ters or loca­ti­on is abroad or who­se loca­ti­on is dis­gu­i­sed. In the­se cases, Swiss access pro­vi­ders are sup­po­sed to block access on the ins­truc­tions of the aut­ho­ri­ties. The Inter­net blocks are to be desi­gned in such a way that the simul­ta­neous blocking of lawful con­tent (“over­blocking”) is avo­ided as far as pos­si­ble. In return for the­se new obli­ga­ti­ons, the bill pro­vi­des for lia­bi­li­ty exemp­ti­ons for pro­vi­ders. They give pro­vi­ders the legal cer­tain­ty they need to ope­ra­te their business.

On pro­vi­der lia­bi­li­ty under the Fede­ral Council’s draft, Riga­mon­ti in the sic! 3/2016, 117 et seq., cri­ti­cal­ly expressed:

This sta­tus quo of pro­vi­der lia­bi­li­ty in Switz­er­land is to be over­laid by regu­la­to­ry obli­ga­ti­ons as part of the ongo­ing copy­right reform, which will bring a “noti­ce and take­down pro­ce­du­re” for hosting pro­vi­ders and requi­re access pro­vi­ders to block access and iden­ti­fy inf­ring­ers in P2P net­works. In return, they are to be released from lia­bi­li­ty as par­ti­ci­pan­ts in copy­right inf­rin­ge­ments by their cus­to­mers. An initi­al ana­ly­sis of the­se new obli­ga­ti­ons shows that the Fede­ral Council’s pro­po­sal over­shoots the mark by far and thus needs to be signi­fi­cant­ly impro­ved in various places.

Draft

Expl­ana­to­ry report

Aut­ho­ri­ty

Area

Topics

Rela­ted articles

Sub­scri­be