datenrecht.ch

IDG ZH

The curr­ent­ly valid Law on Infor­ma­ti­on and Data Pro­tec­tion of the Can­ton of Zurich.
fold out | fold

I. Gene­ral provisions


Art. 1 Sub­ject mat­ter and purpose


1 This Act governs the hand­ling of infor­ma­ti­on by public bodies.
2 Its pur­po­se is,
a. to make the actions of public bodies trans­pa­rent, ther­eby pro­mo­ting the free for­ma­ti­on of opi­ni­on and the exer­cise of demo­cra­tic rights, and to faci­li­ta­te the con­trol of govern­ment action,
b. to pro­tect the fun­da­men­tal rights of per­sons about whom the public bodies pro­cess data.

Art. 2 Scope


1 This Act applies to public bodies. It applies to the courts only inso­far as they per­form admi­ni­stra­ti­ve tasks.
2 It does not app­ly:
a. to the ext­ent that public bodies par­ti­ci­pa­te in eco­no­mic com­pe­ti­ti­on and do not act in a sove­reign man­ner,
b. for the rela­ti­on­ship bet­ween the Can­to­nal Coun­cil and its stan­ding com­mit­tees and the aut­ho­ri­ties and insti­tu­ti­ons sub­ject to its supervision.

Art. 3 Terms


In this law mean:
Public bodies:
a. The can­to­nal coun­cil, the muni­ci­pal par­lia­ments and the muni­ci­pal assem­blies,
b. Aut­ho­ri­ties and admi­ni­stra­ti­ons of the can­ton and the muni­ci­pa­li­ties,
c. Orga­nizati­ons and per­sons under public and pri­va­te law, inso­far as they are ent­ru­sted with the per­for­mance of public duties.
Infor­ma­ti­on:
All records rela­ting to the per­for­mance of a public task, regard­less of their form of pre­sen­ta­ti­on and infor­ma­ti­on car­ri­er. Exclu­ded are records that have not been com­ple­ted or that are inten­ded exclu­si­ve­ly for per­so­nal use.
Per­so­nal data:
Infor­ma­ti­on that rela­tes to an iden­ti­fi­ed or iden­ti­fia­ble indi­vi­du­al.
Spe­cial per­so­nal data:
a. Infor­ma­ti­on which, becau­se of its importance, the way in which it is pro­ce­s­sed or the pos­si­bi­li­ty of its being lin­ked to other infor­ma­ti­on, invol­ves a par­ti­cu­lar risk of inf­rin­ge­ment of per­so­na­li­ty rights, such as infor­ma­ti­on about
1. reli­gious, ideo­lo­gi­cal, poli­ti­cal or trade uni­on views or acti­vi­ties,
2. health, pri­va­cy, race or eth­ni­ci­ty,
3. social assi­stance mea­su­res,
4. admi­ni­stra­ti­ve or cri­mi­nal pro­se­cu­ti­ons or sanc­tions.
b. Com­pi­la­ti­ons of infor­ma­ti­on that allow an assess­ment of essen­ti­al aspects of the per­so­na­li­ty of natu­ral per­sons.
Edit:
Any hand­ling of infor­ma­ti­on such as obtai­ning, sto­ring, using, rewor­king, dis­clo­sing or destroy­ing.
Announ­ce:
Making infor­ma­ti­on acce­s­si­ble, such as gran­ting access, sha­ring or publishing.

II. prin­ci­ples in hand­ling information


1. in general


Art. 4 Trans­pa­ren­cy principle


The public body shall orga­ni­ze the hand­ling of infor­ma­ti­on in such a way that it can pro­vi­de infor­ma­ti­on quick­ly, com­pre­hen­si­ve­ly and factually.

Art. 5 Infor­ma­ti­on management


1 The public body shall mana­ge its infor­ma­ti­on in such a way that admi­ni­stra­ti­ve action is com­pre­hen­si­ble and accoun­ta­bi­li­ty is gua­ran­teed. If seve­ral public bodies pro­cess a com­mon body of infor­ma­ti­on, they shall regu­la­te the respon­si­bi­li­ties.
2 If the public body no lon­ger requi­res infor­ma­ti­on and fin­ding aids for its admi­ni­stra­ti­ve acti­vi­ties, it shall retain them for a maxi­mum of ten years.
3 After expiry of the reten­ti­on peri­od, the public body shall offer the infor­ma­ti­on and fin­ding aids to the com­pe­tent archi­ve. Infor­ma­ti­on that is not archi­ved must be destroy­ed.
4 For the can­to­nal admi­ni­stra­ti­on, the Govern­ment Coun­cil shall regu­la­te the details in an ordinance.

Art. 6 Editing on behalf 


1 The public body may dele­ga­te the pro­ce­s­sing of infor­ma­ti­on to third par­ties, pro­vi­ded that the­re is no legal pro­vi­si­on or con­trac­tu­al agree­ment to the con­tra­ry.
2 It shall remain respon­si­ble for hand­ling infor­ma­ti­on under this Act.

Art. 7 Infor­ma­ti­on security


1 The public body shall pro­tect infor­ma­ti­on by appro­pria­te orga­nizatio­nal and tech­ni­cal mea­su­res.
2 The mea­su­res are based on the fol­lo­wing pro­tec­tion objec­ti­ves:
a. Infor­ma­ti­on must not come to the know­ledge unlawful­ly,
b. Infor­ma­ti­on must be cor­rect and com­ple­te,
c. Infor­ma­ti­on must be available when nee­ded,
d. Infor­ma­ti­on pro­ce­s­sing must be attri­bu­ta­ble to a per­son,
e. Chan­ges in infor­ma­ti­on must be reco­gnizable and traceable.
3 The mea­su­res to be taken depend on the type of infor­ma­ti­on, the type and pur­po­se of use and the respec­ti­ve sta­te of the art.

2. spe­cial prin­ci­ples in hand­ling per­so­nal data



Art. 8 Legality


1 The public body may pro­cess per­so­nal data inso­far as this is sui­ta­ble and neces­sa­ry for the ful­fill­ment of its legal­ly defi­ned tasks.
2 The pro­ce­s­sing of spe­cial per­so­nal data requi­res a suf­fi­ci­ent­ly spe­ci­fic regu­la­ti­on in a for­mal law.

Art. 9 Earmarking


1 The public body may pro­cess per­so­nal data only for the pur­po­se for which it was coll­ec­ted, unless a legal pro­vi­si­on express­ly pro­vi­des for fur­ther use or the data sub­ject cons­ents in an indi­vi­du­al case.
2 For a non-per­so­nal pur­po­se, the public body may pro­cess per­so­nal data if it is made anony­mous and no con­clu­si­ons can be drawn about data sub­jects from the evaluations.

Art. 10 Pri­or checking


The public body shall sub­mit any inten­ded pro­ce­s­sing of per­so­nal data invol­ving par­ti­cu­lar risks to the rights and free­doms of the data sub­jects to the Data Pro­tec­tion Offi­cer in advan­ce for review.

Art. 11 Avo­id­ance of per­so­nal reference


1 The public body shall design data pro­ce­s­sing systems and pro­grams in such a way that as litt­le per­so­nal data as pos­si­ble is gene­ra­ted that is not neces­sa­ry for the per­for­mance of tasks.
2 It shall dele­te, anony­mi­ze or pseud­ony­mi­ze such per­so­nal data as soon as and inso­far as this is possible.

Art. 12. reco­gniza­bi­li­ty of pro­cu­re­ment trans­pa­ren­cy and information


1 The acqui­si­ti­on of per­so­nal data and in par­ti­cu­lar the pur­po­se of its pro­ce­s­sing must be reco­gnizable to the data sub­ject.
2 When obtai­ning spe­cial per­so­nal data, the con­trol­ler of the data coll­ec­tion is obli­ged to inform the data sub­ject of the pur­po­se of its processing.

Art. 13 Qua­li­ty assurance


1 To ensu­re the qua­li­ty of infor­ma­ti­on pro­ce­s­sing, the public body may have its pro­ce­du­res, orga­nizati­on and tech­ni­cal faci­li­ties audi­ted and eva­lua­ted by an inde­pen­dent and reco­gnized body.
2 The Govern­ment Coun­cil shall regu­la­te the details in an ordinance.

III. dis­clo­sure of information


Art. 14 Infor­ma­ti­on acti­vi­ty ex officio


1 The public body shall pro­vi­de infor­ma­ti­on on its own initia­ti­ve about its acti­vi­ties of gene­ral inte­rest.
2 It pro­vi­des infor­ma­ti­on on its struc­tu­re, respon­si­bi­li­ties and cont­act per­sons.
3 The public body may only pro­vi­de infor­ma­ti­on on pen­ding pro­ce­e­dings if this is neces­sa­ry to cor­rect or avo­id fal­se reports or if in a par­ti­cu­lar­ly serious or sen­sa­tio­nal case, imme­dia­te infor­ma­ti­on is indi­ca­ted.
4 It shall make publicly available a list of its infor­ma­ti­on hol­dings and their pur­po­ses. It shall iden­ti­fy infor­ma­ti­on resour­ces that con­tain per­so­nal data.

Art. 15 Media


1 The public body shall, as far as pos­si­ble, take into account the needs of the media in its infor­ma­ti­on acti­vi­ties.
2 It may pro­vi­de for the accre­di­ta­ti­on of media representatives.

Art. 16 Dis­clo­sure of per­so­nal data a. In general


1 The public body shall dis­c­lo­se per­so­nal data if
a. a legal pro­vi­si­on aut­ho­ri­zes it to do so,
b. the data sub­ject has con­sen­ted in the indi­vi­du­al case or
c. it is indis­pensable in indi­vi­du­al cases to avert immi­nent dan­ger to life and limb or the neces­sa­ry pro­tec­tion of other essen­ti­al legal inte­rests is to be given grea­ter weight.
2 In indi­vi­du­al cases, it shall also dis­c­lo­se per­so­nal data to ano­ther public body and to the bodies of other can­tons or of the Con­fe­de­ra­ti­on if the body reque­st­ing the per­so­nal data requi­res it to ful­fil its sta­tu­to­ry duties.

Art. 17 b. Spe­cial per­so­nal data


1 The public body shall dis­c­lo­se spe­cial per­so­nal data if
a. a suf­fi­ci­ent­ly spe­ci­fic pro­vi­si­on in a for­mal law aut­ho­ri­zes it,
b. the data sub­ject has express­ly con­sen­ted to the dis­clo­sure of spe­cial per­so­nal data in an indi­vi­du­al case, or
c. it is indis­pensable in indi­vi­du­al cases to avert immi­nent dan­ger to life and limb or the neces­sa­ry pro­tec­tion of other essen­ti­al legal inte­rests is to be given grea­ter weight.
2 It shall also dis­c­lo­se spe­cial per­so­nal data to ano­ther public body and to the bodies of other can­tons or of the Con­fe­de­ra­ti­on in indi­vi­du­al cases if the body reque­st­ing spe­cial per­so­nal data requi­res it in order to per­form its sta­tu­to­ry duties.

Art. 18 c. For non-per­so­nal purposes


1 The public body may dis­c­lo­se per­so­nal data for pro­ce­s­sing for non-per­so­nal pur­po­ses, unless this is exclu­ded by a legal pro­vi­si­on.
2 The reci­pi­ent must pro­vi­de evi­dence that the per­so­nal data will be made anony­mous, that no con­clu­si­ons can be drawn about data sub­jects from the eva­lua­tions and that the ori­gi­nal per­so­nal data will be destroy­ed after the evaluation.

Art. 19 d. Cross-border


To reci­pi­en­ts not sub­ject to the Coun­cil of Euro­pe Con­ven­ti­on for the Pro­tec­tion of Indi­vi­du­als with regard to Auto­ma­tic Pro­ce­s­sing of Per­so­nal Data, the public body shall dis­c­lo­se per­so­nal data if
a. ade­qua­te pro­tec­tion for the data trans­fer is ensu­red in the reci­pi­ent sta­te,
b. a legal basis per­mits this in order to pro­tect cer­tain inte­rests of the data sub­ject or over­ri­ding public inte­rests, or
c. ade­qua­te con­trac­tu­al safe­guards are pro­vi­ded by the public body.

IV. Right of access to infor­ma­ti­on and other legal claims



Art. 20 Access to information


1 Ever­yo­ne has the right of access to infor­ma­ti­on held by a public body.
2 Every per­son has the right to access his or her own per­so­nal data.
3 In admi­ni­stra­ti­ve and admi­ni­stra­ti­ve justi­ce pro­ce­e­dings that have not been final­ly con­clu­ded, the right of access to infor­ma­ti­on shall be gover­ned by the rele­vant pro­ce­du­ral law.

Art. 21 Pro­tec­tion of own per­so­nal data


The data sub­ject may request the public body to
a. cor­rects or destroys inac­cu­ra­te per­so­nal data,
b. refrains from unlawful pro­ce­s­sing of per­so­nal data,
c. eli­mi­na­tes the con­se­quen­ces of unlawful pro­ce­s­sing,
d. estab­lishes the unlawful­ness of the processing.

Art. 22 Blocking of per­so­nal data


1 The data sub­ject may have the dis­clo­sure of his or her per­so­nal data to pri­va­te par­ties blocked if the public body may dis­c­lo­se per­so­nal data uncon­di­tio­nal­ly on the basis of a spe­cial legal pro­vi­si­on.
2 The public body shall dis­c­lo­se per­so­nal data despi­te blocking if the per­son making the request pro­ves that the blocking pre­vents him or her from pur­suing his or her own rights against the data subject.

V. Rest­ric­tions in indi­vi­du­al cases


Art. 23 Balan­cing of interests


1 The public body shall refu­se to dis­c­lo­se infor­ma­ti­on in who­le or in part or shall defer dis­clo­sure if a legal pro­vi­si­on or an over­ri­ding public or pri­va­te inte­rest pre­vents this.
2 A public inte­rest exists in par­ti­cu­lar if
a. the infor­ma­ti­on con­cerns posi­ti­ons in con­tract nego­tia­ti­ons,
b. the dis­clo­sure of the infor­ma­ti­on inter­fe­res with the opi­ni­on-forming pro­cess of the public body,
c. the dis­clo­sure of the infor­ma­ti­on jeo­par­di­zes the effect of inve­sti­ga­ti­ve, safe­ty or super­vi­so­ry mea­su­res,
d. the dis­clo­sure of the infor­ma­ti­on affects rela­ti­ons among the com­mu­nes, with ano­ther can­ton, with the Con­fe­de­ra­ti­on or with for­eign count­ries,
e. the dis­clo­sure impairs the imple­men­ta­ti­on of spe­ci­fic offi­ci­al mea­su­res in accordance with the objec­ti­ves.
3 A pri­va­te inte­rest exists in par­ti­cu­lar if the pri­va­cy of third par­ties is impai­red by the dis­clo­sure of the information.

VI. pro­ce­du­re for access to information


Art. 24 Request


1 Anyo­ne wis­hing to have access to infor­ma­ti­on in accordance with Art. 20 Para. 1 shall sub­mit a writ­ten request.
2 In respon­se to oral requests, the public body may pro­vi­de infor­ma­ti­on orally.

Art. 25 Exami­na­ti­on of the application


1 The public body may refu­se a request if it rela­tes to infor­ma­ti­on that is alre­a­dy public and available in a rea­sonable man­ner. This source must be indi­ca­ted.
2 If the pro­ce­s­sing of the request invol­ves a dis­pro­por­tio­na­te effort on the part of the public body, it may make access to the infor­ma­ti­on depen­dent on pro­of of an inte­rest wort­hy of pro­tec­tion on the part of the per­son making the request.

Art. 26 Con­sul­ta­ti­on of third par­ties concerned


1 If the public body wis­hes to grant access to the infor­ma­ti­on and the request con­cerns per­so­nal data or infor­ma­ti­on clas­si­fi­ed as con­fi­den­ti­al, the public body shall give the third par­ties con­cer­ned the oppor­tu­ni­ty to com­ment within a rea­sonable peri­od.
2 If the request rela­tes to spe­cial per­so­nal data, the public body shall refu­se the request if the third par­ties con­cer­ned do not express­ly con­sent to access.

Art. 27 Disposition


1 The public body shall issue an order if it wis­hes to refu­se, rest­rict or post­po­ne access to the infor­ma­ti­on reque­sted.
2 If it wis­hes to grant access to infor­ma­ti­on con­tra­ry to the wis­hes of third par­ties, it shall noti­fy the third par­ties con­cer­ned by means of an order.

Art. 28 Time limits


1 Within 30 days of rece­ipt of the request, the public body shall grant access to the infor­ma­ti­on or issue an order rest­ric­ting the right of access.
2 If the public body is unable to meet this dead­line, it shall noti­fy the per­son making the appli­ca­ti­on befo­re it expi­res, sta­ting the rea­sons, as to when the decis­i­on on the appli­ca­ti­on will be available.

Art. 29 Fees and charges


1 The public body shall char­ge a fee for the pro­ce­s­sing of appli­ca­ti­ons from pri­va­te per­sons.
2 No fee is char­ged
a. when access to infor­ma­ti­on requi­res a small amount of effort,
b. for the pro­ce­s­sing of requests con­cer­ning their own per­so­nal data,
c. if the appli­ca­ti­on ser­ves sci­en­ti­fic pur­po­ses and the results of the pro­ce­s­sing are expec­ted to be useful to the public.
3 If the pro­ce­s­sing of the appli­ca­ti­on invol­ves con­sidera­ble costs, the public body shall inform the per­son sub­mit­ting the appli­ca­ti­on accor­din­gly. In this case, it may demand a rea­sonable advan­ce payment.
4 If infor­ma­ti­on is sui­ta­ble for com­mer­cial use, a fee may be char­ged that is based on the market.

VII. Data Pro­tec­tion Offi­cer or Representative


Art. 30. posi­ti­on and salary


1 At the request of the can­to­nal govern­ment, the can­to­nal coun­cil shall elect a data pro­tec­tion offi­cer for a four-year term of office.
2 The sala­ry of the Data Pro­tec­tion Offi­cer shall be equal to 83% of the maxi­mum amount of the hig­hest sala­ry gra­de of the can­to­nal employees.
3 The data pro­tec­tion offi­cer shall be inde­pen­dent. She or he is admi­ni­stra­tively assi­gned to the manage­ment of the Can­to­nal Council.

Art. 31. personnel


1 The per­son­nel law of the can­ton shall app­ly to the Com­mis­sio­ner and his or her staff. The pro­vi­si­ons of this Act remain reser­ved.
2 The com­mis­sio­ner shall be respon­si­ble for the hiring and pro­mo­ti­on of his or her staff within the limits of the bud­get appro­ved by the can­to­nal council.17

Art. 32. bud­ge­ta­ry manage­ment, con­trol­ling and accounting


1 The com­mis­sio­ner is sub­ject to the Con­trol­ling and Accoun­ting Act (CRG)12 and the imple­men­ting decrees of the Govern­ment Coun­cil on this Act.
2 He or she shall be on an equal foo­ting with the Govern­ment Coun­cil with regard to spen­ding powers. §§ Sec­tions 19 – 25 CRG12 app­ly muta­tis mut­an­dis.
3 The com­mis­sio­ner shall keep his or her own accounts. He or she shall sub­mit an annu­al over­view of the deve­lo­p­ment of ser­vices and finan­ces, a draft bud­get and the accounts to the can­to­nal council.

Art. 33 Com­mis­sio­ner in muni­ci­pa­li­ties and organizations


1 The muni­ci­pa­li­ties and the orga­nizati­ons pur­su­ant to § 3 may appoint their own com­mis­sio­ners. The can­to­nal govern­ment may requi­re muni­ci­pa­li­ties with at least 50,000 inha­bi­tants to do so.
2 The com­mu­nes and the orga­nizati­ons pur­su­ant to § 3 shall regu­la­te the elec­tion and orga­nizati­on inde­pendent­ly. They shall ensu­re that the com­mis­sio­ners have the neces­sa­ry pro­fes­sio­nal qua­li­fi­ca­ti­ons and are inde­pen­dent in the exer­cise of their duties and powers. The can­to­nal com­mis­sio­ner shall exer­cise over­all supervision.

Art. 34. tasks


The com­mis­sio­ner or the com­mis­sio­ner
a. sup­ports and advi­ses public bodies on data pro­tec­tion issues,
b. advi­ses pri­va­te indi­vi­du­als about their rights,
c. moni­tors the appli­ca­ti­on of the regu­la­ti­ons on data pro­tec­tion,
d. media­tes bet­ween data sub­jects and public bodies in dis­pu­tes con­cer­ning data pro­tec­tion,
e. informs the public about data pro­tec­tion con­cerns,
f. asses­ses decrees and pro­jects that affect data pro­tec­tion,
g. pro­vi­des edu­ca­ti­on and trai­ning on data pro­tec­tion issues.

Art. 35 Con­trol powers


1 Not­wi­th­stan­ding any obli­ga­ti­on to main­tain sec­re­cy, the com­mis­sio­ner may obtain infor­ma­ti­on from public bodies and com­mis­sio­ned third par­ties in accordance with § 6 about the pro­ce­s­sing of data, inspect the data and have the pro­ce­s­sing demon­stra­ted to him or her, inso­far as this is neces­sa­ry for his or her acti­vi­ties.
2 The public bodies and the com­mis­sio­ned third par­ties shall coope­ra­te in estab­li­shing the facts of the case.

Art. 36 Recom­men­da­ti­ons and powers of intervention


1 If the Com­mis­sio­ner iden­ti­fi­es a breach of pro­vi­si­ons on data pro­tec­tion, he or she shall make a recom­men­da­ti­on to the public body as to what mea­su­res are to be taken.
2 If the public body does not wish to fol­low a recom­men­da­ti­on, it shall issue an order.
3 The com­mis­sio­ner is entit­led to appeal against the order in accordance with the Admi­ni­stra­ti­ve Law Act of 24 May 19599.

Art. 37. cooperation


The com­mis­sio­ner shall coope­ra­te with the bodies of the other can­tons, the Con­fe­de­ra­ti­on and for­eign count­ries that per­form the same tasks in order to ful­fill the con­trol task pur­su­ant to § 35.

Art. 38. Confidentiality


The com­mis­sio­ner and the employees are obli­ged to main­tain the same con­fi­den­tia­li­ty with regard to infor­ma­ti­on of which they beco­me awa­re in the cour­se of their work as the public body hand­ling the matter.

Art. 39. reporting


The com­mis­sio­ner shall peri­odi­cal­ly report to the elec­to­ral body on the scope and focus of acti­vi­ties, on important fin­dings and assess­ments, and on the effect of the law. The report shall be published.

Art. 39 a. Legal protection


1 Appeals against orders issued by the Com­mis­sio­ner in mat­ters of per­son­nel law or admi­ni­stra­ti­on may be lodged with the Admi­ni­stra­ti­ve Com­mis­si­on of the Exe­cu­ti­ve Board of the Can­to­nal Coun­cil.
2 The duty of con­fi­den­tia­li­ty in accordance with § 38 also applies to the appel­la­te bodies.
3 In all other respects, legal pro­tec­tion shall be gover­ned by the Admi­ni­stra­ti­ve Juris­dic­tion Act of 24 May 1959.

VIII Penal provisions


Art. 40 Pro­ce­s­sing of per­so­nal data in breach of contract


1 Anyo­ne who, as a com­mis­sio­ned per­son in accordance with Art. 6, uses per­so­nal data for hims­elf or for others or dis­c­lo­ses such data to others wit­hout the express aut­ho­rizati­on of the com­mis­sio­ning public body shall be lia­ble to a fine.
2 The inve­sti­ga­ti­on and assess­ment of inf­rin­ge­ments is the respon­si­bi­li­ty of the governor’s offices.

IX. Final and tran­si­tio­nal provisions


Art. 41. tran­si­tio­nal law


Infor­ma­ti­on files con­tai­ning spe­cial per­so­nal data exi­sting at the time of the ent­ry into force of this Act may be pro­ce­s­sed or dis­c­lo­sed by the public body for a peri­od of five years after the ent­ry into force of this Act wit­hout the requi­re­ments of Sec­tion 8(2) or Sec­tion 17(1)(a) being met.

Art. 42 Adap­t­ati­on of designations


1 In the fol­lo­wing acts, the term “Data Pro­tec­tion Act” or “Per­so­nal Data Pro­tec­tion Act” is repla­ced by the term “Infor­ma­ti­on and Data Pro­tec­tion Act”:
a. Law on Out­sour­cing of Infor­ma­ti­on Tech­no­lo­gy Services8: § 3 para. 1 and 2,
b. Tax Act: Sec­tion 122, sub­sec­tion 2.
2 In the fol­lo­wing acts, the expres­si­on “per­so­nal data requi­ring spe­cial pro­tec­tion” or “data requi­ring spe­cial pro­tec­tion” is repla­ced by the expres­si­on “spe­cial per­so­nal data”:
a. Law on out­sour­cing of IT ser­vices: § 3 para. 1,
b. Finan­cial Con­trol Act: Sec­tion 25(2).

Art. 43. Upon the ent­ry into force of this Act, the Data Pro­tec­tion Act of 6 June 1993 shall be repealed.



Art. 44. The fol­lo­wing laws are amen­ded as follows:


[…]