Postu­la­te Die Mit­te Group, Die Mit­te, EVP.(23.3050): Bin­ding stan­dards for Switzerland’s digi­tal admi­ni­stra­ti­ve land­scape. Is the­re a need for a digi­tizati­on artic­le in the Fede­ral Constitution?

Postu­la­te Die Mit­te Group, Die Mit­te, EVP.(23.3050): Bin­ding stan­dards for Switzerland’s digi­tal admi­ni­stra­ti­ve land­scape. Is the­re a need for a digi­tizati­on artic­le in the Fede­ral Constitution?

Sub­mit­ted text

In view of the need for coor­di­na­ti­on and har­mo­nizati­on in the cour­se of ongo­ing digi­tizati­on, the Fede­ral Coun­cil is reque­sted to pre­sent in a report what the fur­ther deve­lo­p­ment steps of the Digi­tal Admi­ni­stra­ti­on Switz­er­land (DDA) pro­ject are and what mea­su­res are envi­sa­ged to increa­se the bin­ding natu­re of the mea­su­res of the joint orga­nizati­on of the Con­fe­de­ra­ti­on and the can­tons. The sce­na­rio “Crea­ti­on of a digi­tizati­on artic­le in the Fede­ral Con­sti­tu­ti­on” is also to be pre­sen­ted with initi­al frame­work con­di­ti­ons in terms of content.

Justi­fi­ca­ti­on

Fede­ra­lism and the depart­ment­al prin­ci­ple – ver­ti­cal and hori­zon­tal power sha­ring – are among the foun­da­ti­ons and thus the reci­pe for suc­cess of Switz­er­land. Recent­ly, howe­ver, the sta­te has been con­fron­ted with an increa­se in cross-cut­ting issues that chall­enge the­se two insti­tu­ti­ons. Par­ti­cu­lar­ly in the area of digi­tizati­on, whe­re net­wor­king and inter­ope­ra­bi­li­ty play a cen­tral role, sta­te go-it-alo­ne or island solu­ti­ons repre­sent a prac­ti­ce that must be over­co­me. It is incre­a­sing­ly appa­rent that a “digi­tal divi­de” is ope­ning up bet­ween busi­ness and admi­ni­stra­ti­on in Switz­er­land and that govern­ment digi­tal ser­vices are also under­per­forming in a Euro­pean com­pa­ri­son (Switz­er­land ranks 28 out of 33 after Pol­and and ahead of Greece: https://digital-strategy.ec.europa.eu/en/library/egovernment-benchmark-2022).

The immense bene­fits of digi­tizati­on sim­ply can­not be ful­ly exploi­ted if the various levels of govern­ment and poli­cy are­as do not ope­ra­te within a coor­di­na­ted frame­work. Bin­ding stan­dards are the­r­e­fo­re nee­ded so that increa­sed inter­ope­ra­bi­li­ty of admi­ni­stra­ti­ve systems can be achie­ved. Master data manage­ment (“once only” prin­ci­ple) but also pro­cu­re­ment pro­ce­s­ses can thus be imple­men­ted more effi­ci­ent­ly. In line with the 2006 edu­ca­ti­on con­sti­tu­ti­on, digi­tizati­on also requi­res a bin­ding joint approach by the fede­ral govern­ment and the can­tons. The alre­a­dy exi­sting coope­ra­ti­on orga­nizati­on Digi­tal Admi­ni­stra­ti­on Switz­er­land (DVS) can­not ade­qua­te­ly meet this requi­re­ment today due to a lack of aut­ho­ri­ty to issue direc­ti­ves. For this rea­son, the pre­sent postu­la­te asks the Fede­ral Coun­cil to exami­ne various opti­ons on how the DMS can be fur­ther deve­lo­ped so that the­re is more bin­ding force in the digi­tal admi­ni­stra­ti­ve land­scape in Switz­er­land. The report is to be pre­pared in clo­se coope­ra­ti­on with the can­tons and with the invol­vement of the muni­ci­pa­li­ties and cities. Should this requi­re a con­sti­tu­tio­nal amend­ment, the Fede­ral Coun­cil is asked to draw up a pro­po­sal and attach it to the report.

Aut­ho­ri­ty

Area

Topics

Rela­ted articles

Sub­scri­be