Stand Initia­ti­ve Basel-Stadt (22.313): Advan­ce digi­tizati­on of the Swiss heal­th­ca­re system. Deve­lop data-based eco­sy­stem for rese­arch and society.

Stand Initia­ti­ve Basel-Stadt (22.313): Advan­ce digi­tizati­on of the Swiss heal­th­ca­re system. Deve­lop data-based eco­sy­stem for rese­arch and socie­ty (June 14, 2022).

Sub­mit­ted text

The can­ton of Basel-Stadt is asking the fede­ral coun­cils to adjust the frame­work con­di­ti­ons so that the Swiss heal­th­ca­re system to be digi­ti­zed as quick­ly as pos­si­ble and thus evol­ve into a net­work­ed heal­th­ca­re data eco­sy­stem can. Switz­er­land now needs

  • a com­mon Infras­truc­tu­re, with which health data can be coll­ec­ted, pro­ce­s­sed, stored, shared and also deleted;
  • Com­mon tech­ni­cal, data pro­tec­tion and ethi­cal Stan­dardswhich regu­la­te how this data is to be recor­ded and structured;
  • Recon­nais­sance, buil­ding trust and accep­tance of such a foundation;
  • regu­la­to­ry frame­work and incentives;
  • Edu­ca­ti­on and trai­ning of pro­fes­sio­nals with strong digi­tal skills;
  • a sus­tainable Fun­ding and invest­ments in the digi­tizati­on of healthcare.

Switz­er­land has some cat­ching up to do in the digi­tizati­on of the heal­th­ca­re system. This is pro­ven by seve­ral sources (Ber­tels­mann Digi­tal-Health Index, OECD-Tech­ni­cal and Ope­ra­tio­nal Rea­di­ness Index, stu­dy on digi­ta­lizati­on in health rese­arch by BAK Eco­no­mics, WHO ranks Switz­er­land far behind in the use of elec­tro­nic pati­ent dos­siers) and the Coro­na pan­de­mic has cle­ar­ly shown us this. The Swiss heal­th­ca­re system sim­ply does not have a modern infras­truc­tu­re to coll­ect, store and share data.

Switz­er­land is used to a high level of pro­spe­ri­ty and reli­es on a strong life sci­en­ces loca­ti­on. Life sci­en­ces exports curr­ent­ly account for over 51 per­cent of Switzerland’s total exports. In the future, we will only be able to main­tain this if Switz­er­land is also at the fore­front of digi­ta­lizati­on in the heal­th­ca­re sec­tor and con­ti­nues to deve­lop. Such deve­lo­p­ment steps have alre­a­dy been achie­ved seve­ral times in the Basel regi­on: from the tex­ti­le to the paint indu­stry, from paint to che­mi­stry, from che­mi­stry to phar­maceu­ti­cals and bio­tech­no­lo­gi­cal pro­ducts. The data-based heal­th­ca­re indu­stry is ano­ther such major trans­for­ma­ti­on. The Use of health-rela­ted data allo­ws bet­ter tre­at­ment the­ra­pies, more tar­ge­ted heal­th­ca­re, but also more effi­ci­ent rese­arch and deve­lo­p­ment. Invest­ments in busi­ness are­as or com­pa­nies acti­ve in the digi­tal health sec­tor are incre­a­sing world­wi­de. Howe­ver, Switz­er­land is incre­a­sing­ly losing importance here and the­re is a shorta­ge of spe­cia­lists. Health data for rese­arch and deve­lo­p­ment is used anony­mously, encrypt­ed or with con­sent in accordance with legal requi­re­ments. Despi­te the­se strict requi­re­ments, aggre­ga­ted data is still not available in suf­fi­ci­ent quantity.

The attrac­ti­ve­ness of the life sci­en­ces indu­stry in the Basel regi­on – a draught hor­se of the Swiss eco­no­my – will decli­ne in inter­na­tio­nal com­pa­ri­son if the digi­tizati­on of the heal­th­ca­re system is not rapid­ly advan­ced. For the Basel regi­on, the life sci­en­ces indu­stry gene­ra­tes over a third of the total regio­nal value added. Moreo­ver, the­se indu­stries employ over 32,000 peo­p­le in the regi­on. Switz­er­land stands to lose a gre­at deal if the chal­lenges of the trans­for­ma­ti­on that has begun are not maste­red. The cour­se must be set quickly.

Indu­stry and aca­de­mia agree, and poli­cy­ma­kers have reco­gnized the need for action. The respon­se to the Moti­on 21.3021 “Added value for rese­arch and socie­ty through data-based eco­sy­stems in heal­th­ca­re”. of the Natio­nal Council’s Com­mit­tee for Eco­no­mic Affairs, Edu­ca­ti­on and Cul­tu­re also cle­ar­ly shows: The wheels are tur­ning too slow­ly, and the­re is a lack of a uni­form and com­pre­hen­si­ve master plan with measures.

A stan­ding initia­ti­ve of the can­ton of Basel-Stadt, which is par­ti­cu­lar­ly affec­ted by insuf­fi­ci­ent digi­tizati­on of the heal­th­ca­re system, Lends par­ti­cu­lar empha­sis to the spe­cial needs of the life sci­en­ces regi­on.

Justi­fi­ca­ti­on

The coll­ec­tion and struc­tu­re of (cli­ni­cal) data in the Swiss heal­th­ca­re system is poor­ly regu­la­ted. Moreo­ver, digi­tal data pro­ce­s­sing is not yet wide­spread, espe­ci­al­ly in the out­pa­ti­ent sec­tor and to some ext­ent also in the long-term care sec­tor. The finan­cing system of the heal­th­ca­re system crea­tes only limi­t­ed incen­ti­ves for coope­ra­ti­on bet­ween the indi­vi­du­al ser­vice pro­vi­ders. This leads to the fact that the exi­sting health data is stored in indi­vi­du­al systems that are fun­da­men­tal­ly not lin­ked to each other and their struc­tu­re, seman­tics and meta­da­ta are not uni­form­ly regu­la­ted. Inter­ope­ra­bi­li­ty does not exist across the board.

The digi­tizati­on of the Swiss heal­th­ca­re system is rather litt­le advan­ced in inter­na­tio­nal com­pa­ri­son, as the fede­ral govern­ment also sta­tes in the “Health Poli­cy Stra­tegy of the Fede­ral Coun­cil 2020 – 2030”. In its stra­tegy, it empha­si­zes the importance of health data for both medi­cal rese­arch and health care, as well as for main­tai­ning and streng­thening public health, and calls for the coor­di­na­ti­on of digi­tizati­on in the health system among part­ners, which will enable the mul­ti­ple use of data and infras­truc­tures. In this con­text, the Can­ton of Basel-Stadt wel­co­mes the decis­i­on of the Fede­ral Coun­cil of May 4, 2022, which aims to crea­te the con­di­ti­ons for the deve­lo­p­ment of a data system for rese­arch in the health sector.

The “Swiss Per­so­na­li­zed Health Net­work” (SPHN) also wel­co­mes the direc­tion of the initia­ti­ve. Curr­ent­ly, health data are most­ly stored in non-uni­form for­mats and stan­dards and often in inac­ce­s­si­ble loca­ti­ons, which means that even whe­re data can be shared, they are usual­ly insuf­fi­ci­ent­ly descri­bed, not stan­dar­di­zed and the­r­e­fo­re hard­ly usable for fur­ther use. The SPNH the­r­e­fo­re sup­ports the deve­lo­p­ment of an over­ar­ching stra­tegy for data reu­se within the con­text of appro­pria­te fede­ral legis­la­ti­on. Becau­se data from out­side the health system are also rele­vant to health issues, it also empha­si­zes that coor­di­na­ti­on across depart­ments must be observed.

The coor­di­na­ti­on of health data is also con­side­red important inter­na­tio­nal­ly. For exam­p­le, Fin­land crea­ted “Fin­da­ta” in 2019, a govern­ment agen­cy that coll­ects data from the health and social sec­tors and makes it available digi­tal­ly. The goal here is to ensu­re data pri­va­cy and data secu­ri­ty of health as well as social data and make it available for effi­ci­ent moni­to­red use. A data uti­lizati­on law defi­nes pos­si­ble uses. The indi­vi­du­al data can also be lin­ked across dif­fe­rent regi­sters via a per­so­nal iden­ti­fier. The Fin­nish popu­la­ti­on can deci­de on the pro­vi­si­on of their own data by means of an opt-out option.

The Govern­ment Coun­cil of the Can­ton of Basel-Stadt is con­vin­ced that the Crea­ting a natio­nal health data eco­sy­stem is able to sus­tain­ab­ly pro­mo­te medi­cal rese­arch and health care, thus making a valuable con­tri­bu­ti­on to main­tai­ning and streng­thening public health and pro­mo­ting the inno­va­ti­ve strength of the local life sci­ence industry.

Aut­ho­ri­ty

Area

Topics

Rela­ted articles

Sub­scri­be