Take-Aways (AI)
  • Requests for infor­ma­ti­on can trig­ger simp­le to very com­plex pro­ce­s­ses depen­ding on the com­pa­ny struc­tu­re, system com­ple­xi­ty and con­text (often with hid­den intent).
  • Key que­sti­ons con­cern the refu­sal or rest­ric­tion of infor­ma­ti­on, the gra­du­al pro­vi­si­on of infor­ma­ti­on after cla­ri­fi­ca­ti­on and the dead­lines to be obser­ved under the new DPA.

When a com­pa­ny recei­ves a request for infor­ma­ti­on, a pro­cess beg­ins that can be very simp­le or very com­plex – depen­ding on the com­ple­xi­ty of the pro­ce­s­sing and the struc­tu­re of the com­pa­ny and its systems, but also depen­ding on the con­text: Often, if not usual­ly, requests for infor­ma­ti­on are not about an inno­cent inquiry, but about a hid­den (or not so hid­den) agen­da. Espe­ci­al­ly then, que­sti­ons ari­se, for exam­p­le, about the refu­sal or rest­ric­tion of the infor­ma­ti­on. The que­sti­on also ari­ses as to whe­ther it is suf­fi­ci­ent to pro­vi­de infor­ma­ti­on only about cer­tain data in a first step and to pro­vi­de fur­ther infor­ma­ti­on in a second step after the data sub­ject has spe­ci­fi­ed the data, and within what peri­od of time the request must be answered.

We – Wal­der Wyss with Simon Hen­se­ler, Han­nes Meyle, Anne-Sophie Morand and Ken­to Reu­ti­mann – have illu­stra­ted the pro­ce­du­re under the new DPA and the Ordi­nan­ce in a flow­chart that can be down­loa­ded here:

Link (PDF)

We are gra­teful for sug­ge­sti­ons for adap­t­ati­on and improvement!