Refi­ne selection:

HGer ZH: No deli­sting obli­ga­ti­on of Goog­le due to lack of (here) suf­fi­ci­ent coope­ra­ti­on actions
ECJ
ECJ (Case C‑460 20): Exami­na­ti­on of deli­sting requests by search engi­ne operators
Den­mark: Ban on the use of Chrome­books and Goog­le Workspace by municipalities
Ita­ly: Use of Goog­le Ana­ly­tics also prohibited
DPO Austria: Goog­le Ana­ly­tics II – sin­gu­la­rizati­on is suf­fi­ci­ent; no indi­vi­du­al-spe­ci­fic deter­mi­na­ti­on of appropriateness
Postu­la­te Fivaz (21.4498): Per­so­na­li­zed adver­ti­sing. Pro­hi­bi­ti­on of adver­ti­sing based on data coll­ec­tion and profiling.
CNIL: Use of Goog­le Ana­ly­tics illegal
DPO Austria: use of Goog­le Ana­ly­tics pro­hi­bi­ted; stan­dard for third-coun­try review; sin­gu­la­rizati­on instead of identification
Cloud pro­vi­ders: Risk manage­ment and con­tract negotiation
1 2 3